Health beliefs and rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

doi:10.1016/0022-3999(84)90007-2

Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Volume 28, Issue 2, 1984, Pages 139-144

https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3999(84)90007-2 Get rights and content

Abstract

Thirty per cent of patients fail to rehabilitate after back surgery. Pre-operative physical assessment cannot reliably identify these patients. A questionnaire assesses the health beliefs and extent of rehabilitation in 200 patients who have undergone a laminectomy. Objective medical data and ten subjective scales are analyzed, which correlate very highly with quality of rehabilitation. The questionnaire identifies ‘at risk’ individuals far better than objective physical findings, and it makes specific pathological attitudes clear. These attitudes can be used to direct existing post-operative care resources in an efficient way.

References (14)

BH Burns et al.
Results of surgery in sciatica and low back pain
Lancet
(1951)
MA Nelson
Backache
Practitioner
(1981)
A Hakelius
Prognosis in sciatica
Acta Orthop Scand
(1970)
J Turner et al.
Psychological interventions for chronic pain: a critical review—I & II
Pain
(1982)
W Mischel
Personality and Assessment
(1968)
W Fordyce
Behavioural Methods for Chronic Pain and Illness
(1976)
P Ley
Communicating with the patient

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (24)

Pain behavior in industrial subacute low back pain. part I. Reliability: concurrent and predictive validity of pain behavior assessments
1994, Pain
The reproducibility of overt pain behavior ratings was shown to be reliable between independent observers. In the clinical evaluation of 103 blue collar workers with subacute low back pain (LBP), concurrent validity was high between Behavioural Signs (Waddell et al. 1980) and UAB Pain Behavior Rating scale (Richards et al. 1982). Correlations with pain rated on visual analogue scales (Scott and Huskisson 1976) were generally lower. Behavioural Signs correlated separately with covert pain behavior (general convictions concerning back strength and general health). It seems that subacute LBP patients do not behave as a homogenous group since pain behaviors predicted occupational handicap (absenteeism) in a non-linear fashion. Return to work was best predicted by UAB and covert pain behavior, absenteeism up to 2 years by covert pain behavior. The findings emphazise the potential social implications of overt pain behaviors and the importance of covert pain behavior in maintaining the sick role. The conclusion is that, in secondary prevention, where the main targets are to interfere with somatic deconditioning and sick-role development, a more diversified primary approach may be possible, based on supplementary use of relatively easy observational tests and quick self-reports.
Health locus of control beliefs and psychological distress as predictors for treatment outcome in low-back pain patients: results of a 3-month follow-up of a controlled intervention study
1991, Pain
Association of health locus of control beliefs (HLC) and psychological distress (GHQ-12) with short-term outcome of low-back pain (LBP) rehabilitation was studied in patients with chronic or recurrent LBP (n = 459; aged 35–54 years; 63% men). These patients were randomly assigned to 3 study groups, namely the inpatient, the outpatient and the control group. The results showed a significant decrease in disability due to LBP in the 2 treated groups; in addition, the accomplishment and frequency of back exercises was significantly better in the treated groups. HLC beliefs were associated with a successful outcome; those patients with stronger internal beliefs had gained more from the treatment, had learned their exercises better and had done the exercises more frequently during the follow-up period. Symptoms of psychological distress were significantly associated with poorer accomplishment of back exercises.
Psychological factors associated with disability in arthritis
1986, Journal of Psychosomatic Research
A sample of chronically disabled arthritic patients was studied in 1981, and again in 1983, using a questionnaire which included attitudinal and mood items. The majority of patients had high pain and disability, and this did not significantly change between 1981 and 1983. The questionnaire was able to significantly discriminate between subjective disability and pain groups. This discrimination was more accurate than that made by orthopaedic surgeons using physical ratings alone, and possible ‘good coping’ and ‘bad coping’ profiles emerged.
The Effect of Dispositional Optimism in HRQOL in Patients with Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions in Greece
2011, Applied Research in Quality of Life
Role of coping strategies and social support in perceived illness consequences and controllability among diabetic women
2007, Psychology and Developing Societies
Health beliefs and behaviour of cervix cancer patients
2006, Psychology and Developing Societies

View all citing articles on Scopus

^∗: Author to whom correspondence and reprint requests should be addressed.

View full text

Health beliefs and rehabilitation after lumbar disc surgery

Abstract

Lancet

Backache

Practitioner

Prognosis in sciatica

Acta Orthop Scand

Psychological interventions for chronic pain: a critical review—I & II

Pain

Personality and Assessment

Behavioural Methods for Chronic Pain and Illness

Communicating with the patient