The role of right side objects in left side neglect: A dissociation between perceptual and directional motor neglect
References (36)
Effect of stimuli in right hemispace on left-sided neglect
Neuropsychologia
(1992)- et al.
Different patterns of dissociation in unilateral spatial neglect
Brain Cognit.
(1991) - et al.
Attentional shift towards the rightmost stimuli in patients with left visual neglect
Cortex
(1989) - et al.
Space exploration with and without the aid of vision in patients with unilateral brain damage
Cortex
(1989) - et al.
Darkness improves line bisection in unilateral spatial neglect
Cortex
(1992) Ocular exploration in the dark by patients with visual neglect
Neuropsychologia
(1992)Mechanisms of unilateral neglect
- et al.
The deployment of attention in the intact field of hemineglect patients
Cortex
(1990) - et al.
How do the parietal lobes direct covert attention?
Neuropsychologia
(1987) - et al.
Components of neglect from right-hemisphere damage: An analysis of line bisection
Neuropsychologia
(1990)
The effect of cuing on unilateral neglect
Neuropsychologia
The anatomy of unilateral neglect after right hemisphere stroke lesions. A clinical CT/Scan correlation study in man
Neuropsychologia
A simple test of visual neglect
Neurology
Perceptual and premotor factors of unilateral neglect
Neurology
Space representation in unilateral spatial neglect
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat.
Directional hypokinesia and hemispatial inattention in neglect
Brain
Disorders of Space Exploration and Cognition
Hemi-inattention in rehabilitation: The evolution of a rational remediation program
Cited by (56)
Perception of active head rotation in patients with severe left unilateral spatial neglect
2017, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceIncreased attentional demands impair contralesional space awareness following stroke
2010, NeuropsychologiaEvaluating visual bias and effect of proprioceptive feedback in unilateral neglect
2010, Journal of Clinical NeuroscienceCitation Excerpt :De Renzi et al. found that, in patients with left neglect, attention is magnetically attracted by stimuli presented to the right side.8 Ladavas et al. found that patients with left neglect were faster to respond to targets on their right than to those in the relative left position.9 In contrast to these attentional explanations of spatial neglect, other researchers have proposed that neglect is a supramodal deficit rather than an input-related deficit.
The role of automatic orienting of attention towards ipsilesional stimuli in non-visual (tactile and auditory) neglect: A critical review
2010, CortexCitation Excerpt :The claim that the visual modality has an important influence on the spatial orienting of attention is confirmed when the severity of neglect is compared in the visual and the tactile modalities in studies in which neglect has been investigated with the same research paradigm under visual control and with patients blindfolded. Neglect was, indeed, more severe under visual control than in the absence of vision in 7 out of the 10 studies reported in Table 3 (Chedru, 1976; Gentilini et al., 1989; Fujii et al., 1991; Hjaltason et al., 1993; Làdavas et al., 1993; Chokron et al., 2002a, 2002b; Schindler et al., 2006). Furthermore, a systematic comparison of the results obtained with and without the influence of vision was made in only one (Caneman et al., 1992) of the three other investigations in which greater severity of visual neglect was not reported, and in this study the hand used for the tactile task was not reported.
Is the Posner Reaction Time Test More Accurate Than Clinical Tests in Detecting Left Neglect in Acute and Chronic Stroke?
2009, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationCitation Excerpt :We recorded before and after demonstration total misses and left to right difference. The shape test36 was intended to identify patients whose neglect might be a result of difficulty disengaging their attention from the ipsilesional field. Patients were to touch 16 colored wooden shapes arrayed on a felt board, presented in peripersonal space, under 4 randomly ordered conditions.