Elsevier

Neuropsychologia

Volume 33, Issue 11, November 1995, Pages 1485-1510
Neuropsychologia

Two types of image generation: Evidence for left and right hemisphere processes

https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00077-GGet rights and content

Abstract

The results from seven experiments provide evidence that visual mental images can be generated by either the left or right cerebral hemisphere, but in different ways. Subjects were cued to form images within a grid or within a set of four corner brackets; a single X mark was enclosed within each stimulus, and the subjects were to determine whether the X mark would have fallen on an imaged pattern. When subjects memorized descriptions of how parts were arranged, they could later form images of the composite pattern when cued in the right visual field (left hemisphere) more accurately than when they were cued in the left visual field (right hemisphere). In contrast, when subjects memorized individual segments on a screen, and ‘mentally glued’ them into a single pattern, they later could form images more accurately, at least in some circumstances, when cued in the left visual field. These results were predicted by the theory that images are built up by arranging parts, and that two different processes can be used to arrange them. One process uses stored descriptions to arrange parts, and is more effective in the left cerebral hemisphere; the other process uses stored memories of metric positions to arrange parts, and is more effective in the right cerebral hemisphere. Convergent evidence was obtained by having subjects memorize letters in grids (which are easily encoded using descriptions of the positions of segments) or within a space delineated by four brackets (which require memorizing the precise positions of the segments). Subjects were relatively more accurate when cued in the left visual field with bracket stimuli, but tended to be relatively more accurate when cued in the right visual field with grids stimuli. Control experiments showed that this finding was not due to hemispheric differences in the ease of forming images at different sizes or differences in the ease of perceptually encoding the probes.

References (45)

  • SergentJ. et al.

    Role of input factors in visual-field asymmetries

    Brain Cognit.

    (1986)
  • Van KleeckM.H.

    Hemispheric differences in global versus local processing of hierarchical visual stimuli by normal subjects: New data and a meta-analysis of previous studies

    Neuropsychologia

    (1989)
  • Van KleeckM.H. et al.

    Gestalt laws of perceptual organization in an embedded figures task: Evidence for hemispheric specialization

    Neuropsychologia

    (1989)
  • BeaumontJ.

    Studies with verbal stimuli

  • BiedermanI.

    Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding

    Psychol. Rev.

    (1987)
  • BowerG.H. et al.

    Structural units and the reintegrative power of picture fragments

    J. exp. Psychol: Hum. Learn. Mem.

    (1976)
  • BrydenM.P.

    Laterality: Functional Asymmetry in the Intact Brain

    (1982)
  • CaveC.B. et al.

    The role of parts and spatial relations in object identification

    Perception

    (1993)
  • De RenziE.

    Disorders of Space Exploration and Cognition

    (1982)
  • DrorI. et al.

    Mental imagery and aging

    Psychol. Aging

    (1994)
  • EimasP.D. et al.

    Speech perception in infants

    Science

    (1971)
  • ErlichmanH. et al.

    Right hemisphere specialization for mental imagery: A review of the evidence

    Brain Cognit.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (88)

    • Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the posterior parietal cortex enhances three-dimensional mental rotation ability

      2021, Neuroscience Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are some possible reasons to explain the lack of significant tDCS effects on mental rotation operations in the left PPC stimualtion condition. First, the left hemisphere had a superiority in verbal categorical encoding of an object (Feredoes and Sachdev, 2006; Kosslyn et al., 1995). Prior studies indicated that the left PPC activity was specific to mental rotation of alphanumeric characters (Alivisatos and Petrides, 1997; Vingerhoets et al., 2001), whereas, the three-dimensional cubes was used in the current study.

    • The retrieval of perceptual memory details depends on right hippocampal integrity and activation

      2016, Cortex
      Citation Excerpt :

      Maguire (2001b; Spiers, Burgess, et al., 2001) has suggested that the left hippocampus might support the retrieval of event details (who did what when), while the right hippocampus might specialize in spatial memory and navigation. Kosslyn and colleagues have also shown that representations based on semantics and categorical distinctions rely preferentially on the left hemisphere of the brain, while imagery that involves very specific spatial representations relies preferentially on the right hemisphere (Kosslyn, Maljkovic, Hamilton, Horwitz, & Thompson, 1995; Kosslyn, Thompson, Sukel, & Alpert, 2005; Kosslyn et al., 1989). Similarly, Stevens and colleagues (Stevens, Kahn, Wig, & Schacter, 2012) have shown that the left parahippocampal place area (PPA), a region that provides significant inputs into the hippocampus proper, shows repetition suppression to conceptually similar images of scenes, while the right PPA only shows repetition suppression to the exact same scene, providing evidence of form-specific visual processing in the right MTL.

    • A history of brain asymmetry studies

      2016, The Curated Reference Collection in Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text