Elsevier

Surgical Neurology

Volume 45, Issue 3, March 1996, Pages 278-281
Surgical Neurology

The fiberoptic intraparenchymal cerebral pressure monitor in 244 patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-3019(95)00359-2Get rights and content

First page preview

First page preview
Click to open first page preview

References (13)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (45)

  • Intracranial Pressure–Guided Shunt Valve Adjustments with the Miethke Sensor Reservoir

    2018, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    The technical failure rate was 8% (n = 2). Generally, the technical failure rate of conventional intraparenchymal monitors ranges from 3% to 16%.18,25,46,47 Measurement inaccuracies may stem from absent or minimal CSF flow through the SR in slit ventricles (Figure 4) and zero-point drifting.

  • Telemetric Intracranial Pressure Monitoring with the Raumedic Neurovent P-tel

    2016, World Neurosurgery
    Citation Excerpt :

    In only 1 patient anamnesis showed a traumatic incident that could be considered responsible for damage of the device. Table 2 provides all relevant complications that can be associated with the P-tel implantation and offers a summary of the literature.1,4,35-40 A 73-year-old male patient was referred by his family doctor because of progressive headaches, dizziness, memory deficits, and gait disturbances.

  • Analysis on the risk factors of intracranial infection secondary to traumatic brain injury

    2015, Chinese Journal of Traumatology - English Edition
    Citation Excerpt :

    Secondly, in modern intensive care units, intracranial pressure (ICP) monitor in the severe head injury patient is recommended by all guidelines based on available clinical evidence.21–23 ICP monitor may be one of risk factors in the development of intracranial infection.21,24,25 Due to the lack of relevant data, we did not analyze this factor.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text