Focal stimulation of human cerebral cortex with the magnetic coil: a comparison with electrical stimulation

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(89)90029-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Percutaneous stimulation of human motor cortex electrically (focal anode) and with magnetic coils (MCs) of various designs is compared. The theoretical prediction was confirmed that positioning the standard round MC laterally and orientating it more towards the vertical induces an electric field appropriate for directly exciting corticospinal neurons (cf., the conventional tangential orientation at the vertex). Thus, during voluntary contraction, minimal latency compound motor action potentials (CMAPs) in contralateral arm were elicited both by focal anodic and appropriately oriented MC stimulation. Conduction time from motor cortex to motoneuron was estimated by subtracting peripheral conduction time and monosynaptc delay at the motoneuron from the overall CMAP latency, yielding an estimated corticospinal conduction velocity as high as 66 m/sec. Discontinuous latency variations observed in population CMAPs or individual motor units approximated mono- or polysynaptic cortical synaptic delays and, therefore, are attributed to the intervals between direct and early, or late indirect corticospinal discharges. A TV computer system was used to track movements of individual digits and the hand following MC stimulation. An appropriately oriented MC readily elicited movements predominantly of a single digit, implying focal activation of motor cortex. A double square and a small pointed MC proved especially convenient for eliciting reproducibly single digit movements. Stronger stimulation revealed a topographical gradient in the responses of the different digits. Responses to a given MC stimulus a little above threshold were variable in amplitude, which could not be explained by the relationship of stimulus to phase of the cardiac or respiratory cycle. Overall, our findings indicate the importance of appropriately orientating a standard round MC and using a specially designed MC to obtain the various types of motor response to stimulation of cerebral cortex.

References (50)

  • V.E. Amassian et al.

    Suppression of human visual perception with the magnetic coil over occipital cortex

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1988)
  • V.E. Amassian et al.

    Focal magnetic coil activation of human motor cortex elicits a sense of movement in ischemically paralyzed, distal arm

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1988)
  • H. Asanuma et al.

    Relationship between afferent input and motor outflow in cat motor-sensory cortex

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1968)
  • A.T. Barker et al.

    Magnetic stimulation of the human brain

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1985)
  • A.T. Barker et al.

    Magnetic stimulation of the human brain and peripheral nervous system: an introduction and the results of an initial clinical evaluation

    Neurosurgery

    (1987)
  • J.L. Barker et al.

    Pentobarbitone pharmacology of mammalian central neurones grown in tissue culture

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1978)
  • D.E. Batson et al.

    A dynamic role of rubral neurons in contact placing by the adult cat

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • R.G. Bickford et al.

    Electrographic and behavioral effects related to depth stimulation in human patients

  • F. Buchthal et al.

    Evoked action potentials and conduction velocity in human sensory nerves

    Brain Res.

    (1966)
  • Cadwell

    MES-10 Operator's Manual

    (1987)
  • B. Calancie et al.

    Motor-unit responses in human wrist flexor and extensor muscles to transcranial cortical stimuli

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1987)
  • M.I. Cohen et al.

    Periodicities in efferent discharge of splanchnic nerve of the cat

    Am. J. Physiol.

    (1970)
  • T.C. Cope et al.

    Cross-correlation assessment of synaptic strength of single Ia fibre connections with triceps surae motoneurones in cats

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1987)
  • J.M.A. Cowan et al.

    The effect of percutaneous motor cortex stimulation on H reflexes in muscles of the arm and leg in intact man

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1986)
  • B.L. Day et al.

    Differences between electrical and magnetic stimulation of the human brain

    J. Physiol. (Lond.)

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text