Main article
Neuromagnetic evidence of pre- and post-central cortical sources of somatosensory evoked responses

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-5597(95)00217-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Somatosensory evoked magnetic fields (SEFs), corresponding with electrical median nerve stimulation, were measured using an MRI-linked, whole-head MEG system. In total 184 hemispheres, SEFs were measured, involving 22 normal volunteers and 70 patients with intracranial lesions. The first SEF peak appeared 20.2 ± 1.5 msec (mean ± S.D.) after stimulation. The first peak was followed by a second and third peak, 7.7 ± 3.2 msec and 14.6 ± 5.4 msec respectively after the first. Corresponding isofield maps suggested a single current dipole oriented in the anterior direction for the first peak, posterior for the second and either anterior or posterior for the third. Using a spherical model and a single current dipole source, the localization of each peak was estimated and superimposed on individually determined MRI images. On a grand average basis, the first-peak dipole was localized on the posterior surface of the central sulcus, “area 3b.”. The second-peak dipole was localized 3.7 mm medial (P < 0.001) and 2.0 mm superior (P < 0.001) to the first-peak dipole, on the anterior wall of the central sulcus, “area 4”. This study with a large number of subjects was able to statistically distinguish two adjacent cortical sources, located on opposite walls of the central sulcus, and within a few millimeters of each other.

References (40)

  • R. Kakigi

    Ipsilateral and contralateral SEP components following median nerve stimulation: effects of interfering stimuli applied to the contralateral hand

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • N. Nakasato et al.

    Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1995)
  • M. Sonoo et al.

    SEPs in two patients with localized lesions of the postcentral gyrus

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • J. Tiihonen et al.

    Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1989)
  • S. Tsuji et al.

    Scalp topography and distribution of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation

    Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1986)
  • T. Allison

    Scalp and cortical recordings of initial somatosensory cortex activity to median nerve stimulation in man

    Ann. NY Acad. Sci.

    (1982)
  • T. Allison et al.

    On the neural origin of early components of the human somatosensory evoked potential

  • T. Allison et al.

    Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1989)
  • T. Allison et al.

    Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve

    Brain

    (1991)
  • C. Baumgartner et al.

    Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (166)

    • The effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor or somatosensory cortices on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields

      2015, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Since for the present study anodal electrodes were applied over the representational field of the right APB muscle, as determined by a single-pulse TMS, it might be possible that the posterior margin of the electrode was placed near the central sulcus. Matsunaga et al. (2004) reported that early components that generated 3b following median nerve stimulation were unaffected by anodal tDCS with 1 mA, since at area 3b (Allison et al., 1989, 1991; Huttunen et al., 2006; Kawamura et al., 1996; Lin et al., 2005), which is within the depths of the central sulcus, cells experience a smaller voltage gradient from the applied tDCS. It has been assumed that anodal tDCS applied over M1 did not cover area 3b and tDCS applied over S1 did not affect area 3b in the depths of the central sulcus in anodal tDCS applied over S1 in this study.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text