Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Evoked Potentials Section
Main articleNeuromagnetic evidence of pre- and post-central cortical sources of somatosensory evoked responses
References (40)
- et al.
Separate generators with distinct orientations for N20 and P22 somatosensory evoked potentials to finger stimulation?
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1986) - et al.
Color imaging of parietal and frontal somatosensory potential fields evoked by stimulation of median or posterior tibial nerve in man
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1985) - et al.
Non-cephalic reference recording of early somatosensory potentials to finger stimulation in adult or aging normal man: differentiation of widespread N18 and contralateral N20 from the prerolandic P22 and N30 components
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1981) - et al.
Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by differring the cognitive P30, P40, P100 and N140
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1989) - et al.
Bit-mapped color imaging of human evoked potentials with reference to the N20, P22, P27 and N30 somatosensory responses
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1987) - et al.
The scalp topography of human somatosensory and auditory evoked potentials
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1977) - et al.
Comparative study of sensory input to motor cortex in animal and man
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1970) - et al.
Model studies of the magnetocardiogram
Biophys. J.
(1973) - et al.
Cerebral magnetic responses to stimulation of ulnar and median nerves
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1987) - et al.
Scalp topography of human somatosensory evoked potentials: the effect of interfering tactile stimulation applied to the hand
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
(1984)
Ipsilateral and contralateral SEP components following median nerve stimulation: effects of interfering stimuli applied to the contralateral hand
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Functional localization of bilateral auditory cortices using an MRI-linked whole head magnetoencephalography (MEG) system
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
SEPs in two patients with localized lesions of the postcentral gyrus
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Early deflections of cerebral magnetic responses to median nerve stimulation
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Scalp topography and distribution of cortical somatosensory evoked potentials to median nerve stimulation
Electroenceph. clin. Neurophysiol.
Scalp and cortical recordings of initial somatosensory cortex activity to median nerve stimulation in man
Ann. NY Acad. Sci.
On the neural origin of early components of the human somatosensory evoked potential
Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity
J. Neurophysiol.
Potentials evoked in human and monkey cerebral cortex by stimulation of the median nerve
Brain
Neuromagnetic investigation of somatotopy of human hand somatosensory cortex
Exp. Brain Res.
Cited by (166)
Short- and long-latency afferent inhibition; uses, mechanisms and influencing factors
2018, Brain StimulationThe effect of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor or somatosensory cortices on somatosensory evoked magnetic fields
2015, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :Since for the present study anodal electrodes were applied over the representational field of the right APB muscle, as determined by a single-pulse TMS, it might be possible that the posterior margin of the electrode was placed near the central sulcus. Matsunaga et al. (2004) reported that early components that generated 3b following median nerve stimulation were unaffected by anodal tDCS with 1 mA, since at area 3b (Allison et al., 1989, 1991; Huttunen et al., 2006; Kawamura et al., 1996; Lin et al., 2005), which is within the depths of the central sulcus, cells experience a smaller voltage gradient from the applied tDCS. It has been assumed that anodal tDCS applied over M1 did not cover area 3b and tDCS applied over S1 did not affect area 3b in the depths of the central sulcus in anodal tDCS applied over S1 in this study.