Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 41, Issue 10, November 1995, Pages 1383-1394
Social Science & Medicine

Clinical and public health perspectives and applications of health-related quality of life measurement

https://doi.org/10.1016/0277-9536(95)00116-OGet rights and content

Abstract

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures have been developed from the utilitarian ethical perspective of public health medicine which may be contrasted with individual-centred indicators; these empahsise the unique experience of a patient. The impairment-disability-handicap framework provides a more complete description of disease consequences and health outcomes than a generic HRQL indicator. The assessment of reliability and validity of HRQL indicators is often carried out inappropriately: population repeatability is measured when an indicator will be used to examine changes in individuals; between observer variation may be large compared with variation between populations. Content and construct validity are usually measured but the more important predictive validity is neglected. Effect sizes of HRQL indicators are likely to be inflated by use of between subject estimates of variance but the more appropriate within subject variance is seldom reported. HRQL indicators are of very limited value for many clinical and public health tasks: monitoring health of individuals and populations; evaluating the effects of health and social policy; allocating resources; evaluating the effects of treatment. Alternative methods of assessment derived from the impairment-disability-handicap conceptual framework are preferable.

References (68)

  • R.S. Downie et al.

    Healthy Respect

  • S. Ebrahim et al.

    The valuation of states of ill-health: the impact of age and disability

    Age Ageing

    (1991)
  • A. Colvez et al.

    Potential gains in life expectancy free of disability: a tool for health planning

    Int. J. Epidemiol.

    (1983)
  • World Health Organization

    International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps

    (1980)
  • Clearing House on Health Outcomes

    Issues in outcome measurement

    Outcomes Briefing

    (1993)
  • S.M. Hunt et al.

    Measuring Health Status

  • A. Bowling

    Measuring Health?

    (1991)
  • I. McDowell et al.

    Measuring Health

  • A. Stewart et al.

    The MOS short form general health survey: reliability and validity in a patient population

    Med. Care

    (1988)
  • M.J. Bland et al.

    Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • D.S. Smith et al.

    Remedial therapy after stroke: a randomised controlled trial

    Br. Med. J.

    (1981)
  • P. Gompertz et al.

    The reliability of stroke outcome measures

    Clin. Rehab.

    (1993)
  • J.E. Brazier et al.

    Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care

    Br. Med. J.

    (1992)
  • P. Gompertz et al.

    Validating the SF-36

    Br. Med. J.

    (1992)
  • I.R. Reid et al.

    Effect of calcium supplementation on bone loss in postmenopausal women

    New Engl. J. Med.

    (1993)
  • W.M. Garraway et al.

    Observer variation in the clinical assessment of stroke

    Age Ageing

    (1976)
  • T.W. Meade et al.

    Observer variability in the recording of peripheral pulses

    Br. Heart J.

    (1968)
  • C. Jenkinson et al.

    Hospitalisation and its influence on results from health status questionnaires

    Int. J. Hlth Sci.

    (1993)
  • K. Morgan et al.

    Mental health and psychological well-being among the old and very old living at home

    Br. J. Psychiat.

    (1987)
  • S. Ebrahim et al.

    Prevalence and severity of morbidity among Gujarati Asian Elders: a controlled comparison

    Family Practice

    (1991)
  • A. Fletcher et al.

    Quality of life measures in health care. II. Design, analysis and interpretation

    Br. Med. J.

    (1992)
  • J.W. Norris et al.

    Misdiagnosis of stroke

    Lancet

    (1982)
  • S. Bond et al.

    Outcomes of care within a multiple case study in the evaluation of the experimental NHS nursing homes

    Age Ageing

    (1990)
  • A. Bedford et al.

    A new personal disturbance scale (DSSI/sAD)

    Br. J. soc. Clin. Psychol.

    (1976)
  • Cited by (187)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text