Elsevier

Neuroscience Letters

Volume 62, Issue 3, 18 December 1985, Pages 347-352
Neuroscience Letters

Increase of the Bereitschaftspotential in simultaneous and sequential movements

https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3940(85)90573-7Get rights and content

Abstract

The amplitude and duration of the Bereitschaftspotential were analysed in 9 normal subjects prior to four different motor tasks: (1) simple isotonic elbow flexion (‘flex’), (2) simple isometric finger flexion (‘squeeze’), (3) simultaneous performance of ‘flex’ and ‘squeeze’, and (4) sequential performance of ‘flex’ then ‘squeeze’. The Bereitschaftspotential was much larger and slightly longer in the simultaneous and sequential movements than in the same movements performed separately. The amplitudes of the Bereitschaftspotential were measured 150 and 75 ms prior to electromyographic (EMG) onset of the prime mover, and at the time of EMG onset. Changes in size were seen in all leads (FCz, Cz, C3′, C4′) and at all time points. It is suggested that the increase of the Bereitschaftspotential prior to complex arm movements reflects a greater activation of the supplementary motor area before simultaneous and sequential movements.

References (17)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (88)

  • Libet's legacy: A primer to the neuroscience of volition

    2024, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
  • Central nervous system physiology

    2021, Clinical Neurophysiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The amplitude and latency of the BP recorded are influenced by various factors (Shibasaki and Hallett, 2006). Not only simple movement parameters such as force (Kutas and Donchin, 1980) and rate (MacKinnon et al., 1996) impact the amplitude and latency of the BP; but also higher order motor processes such as movement complexity (Benecke et al., 1985; Simonetta et al., 1991), effort (Cunnington et al., 1999; Deecke and Kornhuber, 2002; Wessel et al., 1994) and mode of movement selection (Dirnberger et al., 1998; Jahanshahi et al., 1995; Praamstra et al., 1996; Touge et al., 1995) are important. The reliability of action consequences, whether consistent or inconsistent, has also been demonstrated to influence the amplitude of both the early and late BP (Wen et al., 2018).

  • The effect of the pressure level of sports compression pants on dexterity and movement-related cortical potentials

    2017, Science and Sports
    Citation Excerpt :

    Movement-related cortical potentials (MRCPs) are evoked potentials evident immediately prior to motor action performance and are defined as neural potentials associated with self-paced, voluntary movements. MRCPs are of great interest because they are expected to help identify the neural mechanisms underlying preparation, initiation, execution, and feedback control [18–20]. MRCPs are negative evoked potentials of the brain that could be utilized in the evaluation of cognitions underpinning the prediction of future activities through anticipation and recognition during action preparation [21].

  • Central neuronal motor behaviour in skilled and less skilled novices – Approaching sports-specific movement techniques

    2017, Human Movement Science
    Citation Excerpt :

    From laboratory setups, a consensus on general RP components (Shibasaki, Barrett, Halliday, & Halliday, 1980a and Shibasaki, Barrett, Halliday, & Halliday, 1980b) is lined by on-going debates on factors influencing RP onset and magnitude (Shibasaki & Hallett, 2006). These factors include the precision and speed of movement performances (Masaki et al., 1998), the complexity of a movement (Benecke, Dick, Rothwell, Day, & Marsden, 1985; Kitamura, Shibasaki, & Kondo, 1993a; Kitamura, Shibasaki, Takagi, Nabeshima, & Yamaguchi, 1993b and Simonetta, Clanet, & Rascol, 1991), the motivation and effort to perform a movement (Slobonouv et al., 2004), the timing process of orienting attention towards the moment of initiating a movement (Baker, Piriyapunyaporn, & Cunnington, 2012) as well as the learning of a movement and skill acquisition (Lang, 2003 and Shibasaki & Hallett, 2006). With this, findings on RP responses are not unequivocal, in particular when comparing athletes to non-athletes or different skill levels within sports-related settings that may require different movement characteristics.

View all citing articles on Scopus

Permanent address: Abteilung für klinische Neurophysiologie, Zentrum Neurologische Medizin, Robert-Koch-Strasse 40, D-3400 Göttingen, F.R.G.

View full text