Original contribution
Quantification of MRI lesion load in multiple sclerosis: A comparison of three computer-assisted techniques

https://doi.org/10.1016/0730-725X(96)00018-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Several computer-assisted techniques for measuring multiple sclerosis lesion load on MR images have been developed to provide a quantitative and sensitive means for monitoring disease activity, particularly in the context of treatment trials. We have evaluated three techniques: manual outlining (similar to that of the North American interferon β-1b trial), semiautomated lesion contouring (local lesion based threshold), and intensity-based thresholding for the whole brain. Contiguous, 5 mm-thick, axial, T2-weighted images of the brain were obtained on a 1.5T MR imager in eight patients with clinically definite multiple sclerosis. Analyses of the scans were performed twice, independently by three operators, using the three different techniques. The coefficient of variation of the measurement technique; was: (a) intrarater precision, 9.0 ± 5.2 (mean ± SD) (range 0.4–18.5) for the manual outlining, 2.5 ± 2.1 (0.1–7.7) for the contour technique, and 7.5 ± 6.9 (0.2–22.0) for the global threshold technique; (b) interrater precision, 11.0 ± 5.8 (4.9–21.7) for the manual outlining, 4.5 ± 1.6 (1.8–6.6) for the contour technique, and 11.4 ± 4.9 (2.8–19.2) for the global threshold technique (0.0 = perfect precision). The absolute lesion loads measured were very similar using the manual outlining and the contour techniques but were significantly smaller using the global threshold technique. We conclude that the contour technique is a promising tool for use in treatment trials. Further studies are needed to assess sensitivity to changes in lesion load over time.

References (29)

  • D.J. Thomas et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of spinal cord in multiple sclerosis by fluid-attenuated inversion recovery

    Lancet

    (1993)
  • L.P. Clarke et al.

    MRI segmentation: Methods and applications

    Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1995)
  • D.H. Miller et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging in monitoring the treatment of multiple sclerosis: Concerted action guidelines

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1991)
  • D.W. Paty et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of clinical trials in multiple sclerosis

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1994)
  • C.M. Poser et al.

    New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: Guidelines for research protocols

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1983)
  • J.F. Kurtzke

    Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability scale (EDSS)

    Neurology

    (1983)
  • D.A.G. Wicks et al.

    Volume measurement of multiple sclerosis lesions with magnetic resonance images

    Neuroradiology

    (1992)
  • D.L. Plummer

    DispImage: Un mezzo di analisi e presentazione per iconografia medica

    DispImage: a display and analysis tool for medical images

    Riv. Neuroradiol.

    (1992)
  • J.W. Tukey

    Tukey exploratory data analysis

    (1977)
  • D.G. Altman et al.

    Measurement in medicine: The analysis of method comparison studies

    Statistician

    (1983)
  • J.M. Bland et al.

    Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement

    Lancet

    (1986)
  • Precision of test methods. Part I. Guide for the determination of “reproducibility” and reproducibility for a standard test method by inter-laboratory tests

    British Standard Institution BS 5497

    (1987)
  • Traitement des résultats de mesures

    Normes AFNOR. Statistiques

    (1993)
  • J. Zar

    Measures of dispersion and variability

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text