Article
Residential and home-based postacute rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: A case control study,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0003-9993(99)90276-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the outcomes of severely brain-injured individuals treated in a postacute residential rehabilitation program with a matched sample of individuals receiving limited services in their homes or on an outpatient basis.

Design: Controlled study using a matched design in a before-and-after trial and a 1-year follow-up trial.

Setting: A postacute community-based residential rehabilitation program or in the homes of patients.

Patients and Other Participants: The treatment group included all persons admitted consecutively for rehabilitation to the postacute residential program over a 3-year period (n = 23). All subjects had severe traumatic brain injury. The comparison group was selected from the roster of a support group on the basis of a systematic matching procedure. Matching variables included gender, age, length of coma, time since injury, and level of disability. Subjects of the two groups were matched on an individual basis.

Main Outcome Measures: A functional assessment instrument (modified Health and Activity Limitations Survey [HAls]) and the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ).

Results: Individuals with traumatic brain injury who received residential-based postacute rehabilitation displayed a statistically significant increase in functional abilities when compared with a traditional (home-based) service group. More specifically, treatment subjects showed significantly greater improvement in motor skills and cognitive abilities. Treatment subjects also showed greater improvement in community integration, although this may have been accounted for by initial group differences.

Conclusions: Postacute rehabilitation appears to be effective in improving function for individuals with severe brain injury. Residential-based services appear to produce greater functional improvement, whereas home-based services are more effective at maintaining community integration.

References (27)

  • M Frederickson et al.

    The role of the physician in the postacute continuum

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1995)
  • DN Cope

    The effectiveness of traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: a review

    Brain Inj

    (1995)
  • RW Evans et al.

    Outcome and value: a perspective on rehabilitation outcomes achieved in acquired brain injury

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1992)
  • WM High et al.

    Critical analysis of studies evaluating the effectiveness of rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1995)
  • MV Johnston et al.

    Part I: overview and system principles

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (1994)
  • BT McMahon et al.

    The shortest distance: the pursuit of independence for persons with acquired brain injury

    (1994)
  • HU Aronow

    Rehabilitation effectiveness with severe brain injury: translating research into policy

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1987)
  • GP Prigatano et al.

    Neuropsychological rehabilitation after closed head injury in young adults

    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry

    (1984)
  • DN Cope et al.

    Brain injury: analysis of outcome in a post-acute rehabilitation system. Part 1: general analysis

    Brain Inj

    (1991)
  • MV Johnston

    Outcomes of community re-entry programmes for brain injury survivors. Part 2: further investigations

    Brain Inj

    (1991)
  • L Harrick et al.

    Stability of functional outcomes following transitional living programme participation: 3-year follow-up

    Brain Inj

    (1994)
  • LJ Fryer et al.

    Cognitive rehabilitation and community readaptation: outcomes from two program models

    J Head Trauma Rehabil

    (1987)
  • WH Burke et al.

    Comprehensive head injury rehabilitation: an outcome evaluation

    Brain Inj

    (1988)
  • Cited by (0)

    Presented in part at the 74th Annual Meeting of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine, September 14, 1997, Boston, MA.

    ☆☆

    No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the authors or upon any organization with which the authors are associated.

    View full text