Research article
Transcranial magnetic stimulation as a prognostic tool in stroke

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-510X(96)05312-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Our aims were to evaluate the prognostic usefulness of magnetic motor evoked potentials (MMEPs) in ischemic stroke, to study the evolution of MMEP abnormalities and the relationships between MMEP abnormalities and infarction topography. We prospectively analyzed 50 consecutive ischemic stroke patients who were followed up to 1 year. MMEPs were recorded 1, 3, 30 and 90 days after stroke and we measured amplitudes and latencies/central motor conduction times (CMCTs) of MMEPs from hypothenar, biceps brachiallis, gastrocnemius and quadriceps. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the clinical and MMEPs data were performed. Patients with Rankin 0–3 at 1 year had had acutely MMEPs with shorter latencies and higher amplitudes than patients with Rankin 4–5 or deceased patients. Increased blood pressure correlated with increased survival, whereas increased heart rate and hyperglycemia correlated with increased mortality. The variables infarction size on second CT, age, and first day CMCT-S1 correctly classified 1 year outcome on discriminant analysis. The inclusion of MMEPs values increased the probability of correct classification from 76% to 84%. We conclude that in patients with nondisabling strokes MMEPs may have an independent value in the prediction of prognosis, increasing the accuracy of prognosis calculations made employing clinical and laboratory data. Topography of lesions should be considered when analyzing MMEP abnormalities after stroke.

References (53)

  • S. Bridgers

    Magnetic cortical stimulation in stroke patients with hemiparesis

  • Y. Cao et al.

    Brain reorganization during motor recovery from stroke in humans

    Stroke

    (1996)
  • B.R. Chambers et al.

    Prognosis of acute stroke

    Neurology

    (1987)
  • A. Chamorro et al.

    Early prediction of stroke severity. Role of the erythrocyte sedimentation rate

    Stroke

    (1995)
  • K.H. Chiappa et al.

    Magnetic stimulation of the human motor cortex: ipsilateral and contralateral facilitation effects

    Electroencephlogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • F. Chollet et al.

    The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1991)
  • D. Claus

    Central motor conduction: method and normal results

    Muscle Nerve

    (1990)
  • J.G. Colebatch et al.

    The distribution of muscular weakness in upper motor neuron lesions affecting the arm

    Brain

    (1989)
  • W.J. Dixon
  • M. Dominkus et al.

    Transcranial electrical motor evoked potentials as a prognostic indicator for motor recovery in stroke patients

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1990)
  • P.W. Duncan et al.

    Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome measures and sample size requirements

    Stroke

    (1992)
  • S.A. Edgley et al.

    Excitation of the corticospinal tract by electromagnetic and electrical stimulation of the scalp in the Macaque monkey

    J. Physiol.

    (1990)
  • A. Eisen et al.

    Clinical experience with transcranial magnetic stimulation

    Muscle Nerve

    (1990)
  • J.M. Espadaler et al.

    Respuestas Motoras por Estimulación Magnética Transcraneal: Metodología, Valores Normales y Rendimiento Clínico

    Revista de Neurofisiología Clínica

    (1992)
  • A. Ferbert et al.

    Transcranial magnetic stimulation in pontine infarction: correlation to the degree of paresis

    J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry

    (1992)
  • W. Fries et al.

    Motor responses after electrical stimulation of cerebral hemispheres with a degenerated pyramidal tract

    Ann. Neurol.

    (1991)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    Current address: Center for Stroke Research, Department of Neurology, K-11, Henry Ford Hospital, 2799 West Grand Boulevard, 48202 Detroit, MI, USA.

    View full text