Elsevier

Brain Research Bulletin

Volume 74, Issues 1–3, 14 September 2007, Pages 75-83
Brain Research Bulletin

Research report
Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive interference after pharmacological washout in Parkinson's disease

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.05.009Get rights and content

Abstract

The dopaminergic modulation of prefrontal function in Parkinson's disease (PD) has been consistently demonstrated. There is evidence that the effects of pharmacological manipulations on cognitive performances are described by an “Inverted-U” shaped curve. Neuroimaging studies performed before and after an overnight withdrawal from therapy showed significant differences between drug states, but did not control for the relative impact of the long duration response to levodopa. Here we evaluate the brain response after a complete pharmacological washout by correlating dopaminergic-related changes of this response to changes in performance during cognitive interference. Twelve idiopathic PD patients were studied with functional MRI while performing a modified version of the Stroop task. Patients were scanned twice: (1) following a prolonged washout procedure (“OFF” state) and (2) 90–120 min after the administration of levodopa (“ON” state). Task-related changes of PD patients were compared to those of matched healthy controls. Healthy controls displayed prefrontal and parietal responses that were positively correlated with task accuracy. In the “OFF” state, PD patients showed significant responses in anterior cingulate and pre-supplementary motor area, which are hypothesized to operate at a higher level of basal dopaminergic modulation. Levodopa administration attenuated such responses and enhanced the response of prefrontal cortex (PFC), which was correlated with improved accuracy. Results demonstrate that the behavioral effects of pharmacological manipulations of the dopamine system are highly dependent on the baseline status of PFC. When a true hypodopaminergic state is induced in PD patients, cognitive interference might significantly benefit from the administration of levodopa via an enhanced PFC response.

Introduction

It is recognized that patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) show executive dysfunction [17], [34], [22], which may predict incident dementia [43]. Functional imaging studies invocated a role for disruption of both nigro-striatal [31], [10] and mesocortical dopaminergic pathways [28]. Although levodopa can improve high-level cognition [23], [15], [38], it can also have no effects, or sometimes selectively exacerbate cognitive deficits [37]. This does not depend on neuropsychological specificity of the drug, disease duration or severity. A high variability across cognitive tasks suggests that the magnitude and the direction of the effects of levodopa depend on cognitive demand [8], but they also reflect the amount of dopamine (DA) depletion and the level of DA receptors stimulation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). The relationship between dopaminergic function and cognitive performance follows an “Inverted-U” shaped curve [1], suggesting the need to be in an optimal DA range. Thus, the manipulation of the DA system will be profoundly influenced by baseline individual DA levels in the PFC.

Functional MRI (fMRI) demonstrated that after administrating dextroamphetamine, healthy subjects show an “Inverted-U” shaped relationship between PFC function and working-memory. Dextroamphetamine induced a right shift of DA function in the PFC, as suggested by improved accuracy (optimal stimulation) in poor performers at baseline, but supraoptimal (detrimental) stimulation in good performers [26].

PD offers the opportunity to investigate the pharmacological manipulation of the DA system in humans. Neuroimaging studies evaluated the cognitive effects of a controlled levodopa withdrawal in PD patients, by using ON–OFF approaches [28], [9]. The administration of levodopa induced task-related changes in the PFC response, associated with better performance on specific executive tasks. A limitation of these studies is that they were based on a single overnight withdrawal procedure and therefore they did not account for the long duration response (LDR) to levodopa, a sustained motor benefit that builds up over days and likewise decreases over days after withdrawal [33]. Stable PD patients under chronic treatment are likely close to their maximal therapeutic gain, as they benefit from the LDR. The relatively hypodopaminergic state induced by an overnight drug withdrawal may partly mask the effects of levodopa on the DA system, because of the high variability in terms of medication status and disease progression [45]. Conservative protocols, designed to abolish the LDR, will target the suboptimal-optimal range of the “Inverted-U” curve and might be more sensitive in picking up differences between “ON” and “OFF” states.

Here we used blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) fMRI to test whether: (i) levodopa-induced changes in cognitive performance of PD patients in a complete baseline condition correlate with changes in the BOLD response; (ii) drug effects are still described by an “Inverted-U” curve within the task-related brain network.

The functional response was assessed with the Stroop task. This task relies on the interference of word reading upon color naming, when a color name is displayed using a different color, semantically incongruent. Several investigators using different versions of this task found activations in the anterior cingulate/paracingulate cortices (ACC/pre-supplementary motor area, pre-SMA), parietal cortex and lateral PFC [2], [6], [32], [40]. Conflict resolution is a cognitively demanding condition and is strongly expected to expose impairment in PD patients undergoing a pharmacological washout.

Section snippets

Subjects

Before fMRI testing, patients underwent a full clinical assessment including Hoehn–Yahr (H–Y) staging [20], the Unified PD rating scale (UPDRS) [12] and a general neuropsychological battery that included MMSE [13], verbal fluency [3], Token test [11] and Hamilton's depression rating scale (HRS) [18]. Patients were screened for medical conditions or medication use which could affect the cerebral blood flow. All of them had been in an MR scanner at least once, as part of previous studies and all

Behavioral data

As expected a drug-related motor improvement was found in all PD patients, with a significant decrease in UPDRS-III scores after the pharmacological peak (p < 0.001) (Table 1).

The mean task accuracy was not significantly different in both the “Neutral” and the “Sensorimotor” control conditions when comparing the “OFF” versus the “ON” state. On the other hand, a significant drug-related improvement in accuracy was evident in the “Incongruent” condition (p < 0.03), even if the drug × task interaction

Discussion

This study was designed to induce a truly hypodopaminergic state in a group of mild to moderate idiopathic PD patients. A high-level cognitive task was used (Stroop task) to assess with fMRI the levodopa-induced changes in information processing associated to the task.

A relative drug-related attenuation of the BOLD response was observed during both “Incongruent” and “Neutral” conditions of the Stroop task relative to the “Sensorimotor control” condition. However, when contrasting the

References (45)

  • D. Shohamy et al.

    The role of dopamine in cognitive sequence learning: evidence from Parkinson's disease

    Behav. Brain Res.

    (2005)
  • S.F. Taylor et al.

    Isolation of specific interference processing in the Stroop task: PET activation studies

    Neuroimage

    (1997)
  • S. Tekin et al.

    Frontal–subcortical neuronal circuits and clinical neuropsychiatry: an update

    J. Psychosom. Res.

    (2002)
  • K. Wesnes et al.

    Practice effects on cognitive tasks: a major problem?

    Lancet Neurol.

    (2002)
  • A.F. Arnsten

    Catecholamine modulation of prefrontal cortical cognitive function

    Trends Cognit. Sci.

    (1998)
  • A.L. Benton

    Differential behavioural effects of frontal lobe disease

    Neuropsychologia

    (1983)
  • M.M. Botvinick et al.

    Conflict monitoring and cognitive control

    Psychol. Rev.

    (2001)
  • J.D. Cohen et al.

    Anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex: who's in control?

    Nat. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • R. Cools et al.

    Enhanced or impaired cognitive function in Parkinson's disease as a function of dopaminergic medication and task demands

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2001)
  • R. Cools et al.

    Dopaminergic modulation of high-level cognition in Parkinson's disease: the role of the prefrontal cortex revealed by PET

    Brain

    (2002)
  • A. Dagher et al.

    The role of the striatum and hippocampus in planning: a PET activation study in Parkinson's disease

    Brain

    (2001)
  • E. De Renzi et al.

    The Token test: a sensitive test to detect receptive disturbances in aphasia

    Brain

    (1962)
  • Cited by (56)

    • The role of dopamine in action control: Insights from medication effects in Parkinson's disease

      2021, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Five studies focused on the selective suppression of prepotent, incorrect responses, using either the Stroop task or the Simon task, where relevant and irrelevant stimulus features (e.g., stimulus color and location in the Simon task) signal responses that are either congruent or incongruent. While two of the studies showed no evidence for dopaminergic modulation (Fera et al., 2007; Wylie et al., 2012a,b), three studies showed a beneficial effect of medication on conflict suppression as reflected in the congruency effect (Costa et al., 2014; Trujillo et al., 2019; van Wouwe et al., 2016). Specifically, Costa et al. (2014) observed that medication enhanced patients’ resistance to interference in the Stroop task, but only for patients scoring relatively low on a working memory task and not did for those with relative high working memory capacity.

    • Functional MRI in Parkinson's Disease Cognitive Impairment

      2019, International Review of Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Performance in the Stroop test is often impaired in PD patients, but not always due to altered interference (the effect of color-text incongruence) but rather for slowness in all subtests. Fera et al., following previous evidence that the administration of levodopa is associated with better performance on specific executive tasks, evaluated the brain response during a simple attention task and during neutral and incongruent manual responses of the Stroop Task, both with and without the effect of levodopa (Fera et al., 2007). Their design had the novelty of a long pharmacological washout.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text