A review of casualties during the Iraqi insurgency 2006–A British field hospital experience
Introduction
Following the invasion of Iraq in April 2003, British and coalition forces have remained in South Eastern Iraq as part of an UN mandated force to maintain security. Studies from the war-fighting phase of the early conflict showed a similar pattern of injury to the first Gulf War in 1991, despite changes in the mechanism of wounding.14, 9 With the evolution of the conflict from one of war fighting to a counter-insurgency operation, this study investigates the mechanism and spectrum of injuries caused by hostile action (HA).
The British Military Field Hospital, formerly located at Shaibah Logistics Base, was at the time the sole military hospital supporting Coalition forces in the British area of operations, treating both Coalition and, when need presented, Iraqi civilian casualties. In addition it provided a medical and surgical facility for the 7500 UK service personnel deployed in the area. It consisted of an emergency department, a 4-bedded intensive and high-dependency care unit, a 2-table operating theatre and 50 medium-dependency nursing beds in 3 tented wards. In addition radiological services with X-ray, ultrasound and CT, basic pathology and laboratory services supported the clinical effort. A transfusion capability of packed red cells and fresh frozen plasma was also available.
The clinical team consists of 1 general surgeon, 1 orthopaedic surgeon, 2 consultant anaesthetists, 1 consultant in emergency medicine and 1 consultant physician supported by a small staff of junior doctors, nurses and paramedics.
Casualties received initial treatment and resuscitation either at regimental aid posts or by the helicopter borne immediate medical response team. The majority of casualties were evacuated by helicopter and the remainder by wheeled vehicles.
Section snippets
Methods
All patients who presented to the hospital following injury from HA from January to October 2006 were included in this study. In addition data was collected on all coalition forces that were killed in action (KIA) during this study period. This cohort of patients forms the basis of this study.
Demographic information, mechanism of wounding, pattern of wounding, International Classification of Disease-9th edition (ICD-9) diagnosis,18 duration of any surgical procedures and initial discharge
Results
During the 9-month study period, 1746 patients were assessed at the hospital. Of these 86 were casualties from HA (4.9%). In addition, a further 18 coalition soldiers were KIA during the same period. Seventy-nine were coalition forces (69 UK, 7 Danish, and 3 US), 13 were non-Iraqi contractors and 12 were Iraqi nationals. The mean age of the casualties was 25.7 years (range 18–65).
The mechanism of injury is illustrated in Fig. 1: fragmentation weapons accounted for 76.1 % of casualties, gunshot
Discussion
From March 2003 till March 2007, 3494 Coalition troops have been killed in Iraq with a further 24,187 wounded in action.6 Only a small proportion of patients seen in our facility were injured from HA and our figure of 4.9% is comparable to the findings of previous conflicts.1
The counter-insurgency operation has followed the usual pattern of this type of warfare but has been made especially difficult by the urban terrain. There is no frontline; the terrorists merging with the general population.
Conclusions
Injuries in conflict produce a pattern of injury that is not seen in routine UK surgical practice. In an era of increasing surgical sub-specialisation, the deployed surgeon needs to acquire and maintain a wide range of skills from a variety of surgical specialties. Use of IEDs has become more prevalent in current military operations. In the current global security situation, these tactics can be equally employed against civilian targets. Therefore, knowledge and training in the management of
Conflict of interest
None.
References (18)
- et al.
Accurate anatomical location of war injuries: analysis of the Lebanon war fatal casualties and the proposition of new principles for the design of military personal armour system
Injury
(1996) - et al.
Mortality epidemiology in low-intensity warfare: Israel defense forces’ experience
Injury
(2001) - et al.
A lesson not learned
J Royal Army Med Corps
(2003) Management of small fragment wounds: experience from the Afghan border
J Trauma
(1996)A military surgical team in Belfast
Ann R Coll Surg Engl
(1975)Analysis of wounds incurred by US Army Seventh Corps personnel treated in Corps hospitals during Operation Desert Storm, February 20 to March 10, 2001
J Trauma
(1996)- et al.
Field hospital treatment of blast wounds of the musculo-skeletal system during the Yugoslav Civil War
J Orthop Trauma
(2000) - Coalition wounded and deaths. http://icasualties.org/oif/default.aspx. Accessed March 25,...
- et al.
Small fragment wounds: biophysics, pathophysiology and principles of management
J R Army Med Corps
(2001)
Cited by (86)
Imaging in paediatric blast injuries: musculoskeletal injuries in the Syrian Civil War
2022, Clinical RadiologyMedical and surgical management of lower extremity war-related injuries. Experience of the French Military Health Service (FMHS)
2020, Annales de Chirurgie Plastique EsthetiqueBlast injury prevalence in skeletal remains: Are there differences between Bosnian war samples and documented combat-related deaths?
2017, Science and JusticeCitation Excerpt :Prevalence of blast fracture injuries was higher in the Bosnian sample in all body regions except the head, neck, and face regions and the thorax and back. In a study of trauma sustained during Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF), the prevalence of blast-injuries was recorded for five body regions: chest and back; lower limb; upper limb; head and neck; and the face [28]. Data were collected from wounded soldiers presenting in hospitals during March and April 2003.
Characteristics of mandibular injuries caused by bullets and improvised explosive devices: a comparative study
2017, International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery