Clinical studyAnterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Experience and surgical results in a series of 70 consecutive patients
Introduction
The clinical syndrome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) was first described in the early 1950s.1
The surgical management of CSM via an anterior approach, introduced by Smith and Robinson and subsequently by Cloward, although still widely adopted, is not universally accepted as it is still controversial whether this is the best management choice. Indeed, some previous studies describing this technique, have reported postoperative improvement, whereas others have documented no clinical change and, in some studies, even deterioration. These last studies have raised concerns about the effectiveness of an anterior approach in influencing the natural history of this disease.[2], [3] It is our opinion, however, that some of these studies are not representative for the following reasons: small size of the population studied; clinical heterogeneity; variability of symptoms ranging from pure neck pain to severe radiculopathy with or without myelopathy; unclear preoperative neurological status and imprecise surgical indications.4 We feel that many variables negatively influenced the populations studied, therefore no accurate patient stratification can be made.[5], [6], [7]
Recently, debate over the management of CSM has regained interest; specifically, over operative versus non-operative treatment and about the choice of the most appropriate approach (anterior vs. posterior).[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] A thorough review of the current literature points to a number of factors affecting the postoperative outcome; these include:
- 1.
age
- 2.
duration of symptoms at presentation
- 3.
preoperative neurological status
- 4.
T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI signal intensity changes within the cord indicating cord damage.[15], [16]
As any combination of these factors may be predictive of the postoperative outcome, documenting them preoperatively is crucial for surgical decision-making.
Our aim is to clarify the efficacy and safety of anterior cervical decompression in improving the functional status of patients with CSM and in influencing the natural history of the disease. To this purpose we reviewed the results obtained at the neurosurgery department of Livorno City Hospital (Italy) from October 1997 to June 2002. Outcome, fusion rates, procedure-related complications, instrumentation failure and prognostic factors are assessed, along with pathophysiology and management of CSM. Relevant literature is also reviewed.
Section snippets
Methods and materials
We included in our study 70 patients (47 males, 23 females) out of a total of 77 electively treated. Seven patients were excluded because 12-month follow-up was not available. The age range was 29–76 years (average age, 57 years). These patients were treated consecutively in our institution, in a period of 56 months by the same senior surgeon.
To be included, the patient matched at least one of the following criteria:
- a.
Clinical evidence of cervical myelopathy as determined by spasticity,
Results
The mean preoperative duration of symptoms was 13.4 months, (range 4–120 months). In all cases symptoms and neurological status worsened progressively, of course with variable patterns and times of evolution. However, no patient experienced significant spontaneous improvement in the course of their disease. The most common preoperative symptoms were (Table 2): deficit of motor function in the upper extremities in 34 patients (48.6%), particularly, clumsiness of the hands in 31; (44.3%) gait
Discussion
It is our opinion that, generally speaking, a successful treatment is based on a clear understanding of the pathophysiology and natural history of the disease being treated.[3], [18], [19] In this way, appropriate management can be planned, known complications can be anticipated[20], [21] and, if a clinical study is entertained, then reliable data can be obtained.
Decompressive surgery for CSM has been the treatment of choice for many patients.
Neurological improvement has been documented
Conclusion
Our study documents that anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for CSM appears to be a more effective procedure with a more favorable neurological outcome when compared to posterior decompressive laminectomy, minimally invasive procedures and/or non-surgical treatment. It is also a safe procedure in the elderly,[25], [28], [29], [39] carrying low morbidity with the potential of permanent spinal cord decompression and excellent stability.
In our study population we found no statistical evidence
References (39)
- et al.
The neurological manifestation of cervical spondylosis
Brain
(1952) The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis
Brain
(1972)The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis
Brain
(1972)- et al.
Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy
J Neurosurg
(1995) - et al.
Surgical treatment of cervical destructive spondyloarthropathy (DSA)
Spine
(2000) Surgery in the degenerative cervical spine
Spine
(1998)- et al.
Anterior decompression for myelopathy resulting from thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Spine
(2002) - et al.
Development of new surgical treatments in spinal surgery: expansive open-door laminoplasty and percutaneous nucleotomy
Keio J Med
(2001) - et al.
Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis
Spine
(2002) - et al.
A comparative study of surgical approaches for cervical compressive myelopathy
Clin Orthop
(2000)
Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Spine
Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament
Spine
Cervical laminoplasty to enlarge the spinal canal in multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg
Anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Clin Orthop
Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord
Spine
Quantitative assessment of surgical decompression of the cervical spine with cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging
Neurosurgery
Intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function using motor evoked potentials via transcutaneous epidural electrode during anterior cervical spinal surgery
J Spinal Disord
Hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament is a prodromal condition to ossification: a cervical myelopathy case report
Spine
Cervical myelopathy associated with degenerative spine disease and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament
Semin Neurol
Cited by (59)
Clinical predictors and surgical outcomes following surgical treatment in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: A prospective study
2024, Interdisciplinary Neurosurgery: Advanced Techniques and Case ManagementCervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: When and Why the Cervical Corpectomy?
2020, World NeurosurgeryCitation Excerpt :Moreover, most investigators compared the results of all approaches performed (e.g., anterior discectomy, corpectomy, posterior laminectomy) without clear distinctions. All these aspects could have weakened the accuracy and significance of the reported results.6-41 At our institute, we performed a study exclusively focused on analyzing the effect of a single surgical technique commonly used for the treatment of CSM: cervical corpectomy.
Significant Predictors of Outcome Following Surgery for the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature
2018, Neurosurgery Clinics of North AmericaCitation Excerpt :Twelve studies used postoperative or change in mJOA or JOA as the primary outcome measure. Of these, 8 reported an insignificant association between age and surgical outcome.25,30,33,38–42 In contrast, studies by Su and colleagues,43 Furlan and colleagues,44 and Floeth and colleagues45 identified age as a significant predictor of either postoperative JOA or mJOA or change in JOA scores.
Anterior cervical corpectomy for the treatment of spondylotic myelopathy: results of a prospective double-armed study with a three-year follow-up
2023, Journal of Neurosurgical Sciences