Clinical study
Anterior cervical corpectomy for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: Experience and surgical results in a series of 70 consecutive patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2005.04.011Get rights and content

Abstract

Recently the debate over the management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) has regained interest; more specifically whether treatment should be operative versus non-operative, raising the question about the real effectiveness of surgery in influencing the natural history of this pathology and about the choice of the most appropriate approach (anterior vs. posterior). The authors report a retrospective review of 70 consecutive patients who underwent elective anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with iliac crest autograft or titanium mesh and placement of an anterior cervical plate for the treatment of CSM. The patients underwent pre-and postoperative evaluation, including history, and physical and neurological examination. Patients were also evaluated pre-and postoperatively using a modified version of the Japanese Orthopedics Association Scale (mJOA), which provides a fine semi-quantitative graded evaluation of overall function. Upon discharge home, patients were followed for an average of 42 months (range, 12–63 months). Following an anterior cervical decompression of the spinal cord, 94.2% of patients improved their functional status and 5.8% were unchanged; the mean preoperative mJOA score of all patients was 12.2, the postoperative was 15.4 and the amelioration was also documented by neurophysiological studies which showed an increase in amplitude and decrease in latency of somatosensory evoked potentials and motor evoked potential in 47 patients (67%). Older age and longer duration of preoperative symptoms both were not associated with a lower postoperative mJOA score (p < 0.47, p < 0.29, respectively). Single versus multiple level decompression was not predictive of a lower postoperative mJOA score (p < 0.18). Preoperative spinal cord low signal intensity changes on T1-weighted MRI were related to a lower postoperative mJOA score (p < 0.05), whereas spinal cord high-signal intensity changes on T2-weighted MRI were related to a higher postoperative mJOA score (p < 0.01); finally a lower preoperative mJOA score was highly predictive of a lower postoperative mJOA score (p < 0.0005). Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for CSM appears to be an effective procedure with a more favorable neurological improvement when compared to posterior decompressive laminectomy, minimally invasive procedures or non-surgical treatment. It is also a safe procedure even in the elderly population, with low morbidity and the potential for permanent spinal cord decompression and excellent bone stability.

Introduction

The clinical syndrome of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) was first described in the early 1950s.1

The surgical management of CSM via an anterior approach, introduced by Smith and Robinson and subsequently by Cloward, although still widely adopted, is not universally accepted as it is still controversial whether this is the best management choice. Indeed, some previous studies describing this technique, have reported postoperative improvement, whereas others have documented no clinical change and, in some studies, even deterioration. These last studies have raised concerns about the effectiveness of an anterior approach in influencing the natural history of this disease.[2], [3] It is our opinion, however, that some of these studies are not representative for the following reasons: small size of the population studied; clinical heterogeneity; variability of symptoms ranging from pure neck pain to severe radiculopathy with or without myelopathy; unclear preoperative neurological status and imprecise surgical indications.4 We feel that many variables negatively influenced the populations studied, therefore no accurate patient stratification can be made.[5], [6], [7]

Recently, debate over the management of CSM has regained interest; specifically, over operative versus non-operative treatment and about the choice of the most appropriate approach (anterior vs. posterior).[8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] A thorough review of the current literature points to a number of factors affecting the postoperative outcome; these include:

  • 1.

    age

  • 2.

    duration of symptoms at presentation

  • 3.

    preoperative neurological status

  • 4.

    T1-weighted and T2-weighted MRI signal intensity changes within the cord indicating cord damage.[15], [16]

As any combination of these factors may be predictive of the postoperative outcome, documenting them preoperatively is crucial for surgical decision-making.

Our aim is to clarify the efficacy and safety of anterior cervical decompression in improving the functional status of patients with CSM and in influencing the natural history of the disease. To this purpose we reviewed the results obtained at the neurosurgery department of Livorno City Hospital (Italy) from October 1997 to June 2002. Outcome, fusion rates, procedure-related complications, instrumentation failure and prognostic factors are assessed, along with pathophysiology and management of CSM. Relevant literature is also reviewed.

Section snippets

Methods and materials

We included in our study 70 patients (47 males, 23 females) out of a total of 77 electively treated. Seven patients were excluded because 12-month follow-up was not available. The age range was 29–76 years (average age, 57 years). These patients were treated consecutively in our institution, in a period of 56 months by the same senior surgeon.

To be included, the patient matched at least one of the following criteria:

  • a.

    Clinical evidence of cervical myelopathy as determined by spasticity,

Results

The mean preoperative duration of symptoms was 13.4 months, (range 4–120 months). In all cases symptoms and neurological status worsened progressively, of course with variable patterns and times of evolution. However, no patient experienced significant spontaneous improvement in the course of their disease. The most common preoperative symptoms were (Table 2): deficit of motor function in the upper extremities in 34 patients (48.6%), particularly, clumsiness of the hands in 31; (44.3%) gait

Discussion

It is our opinion that, generally speaking, a successful treatment is based on a clear understanding of the pathophysiology and natural history of the disease being treated.[3], [18], [19] In this way, appropriate management can be planned, known complications can be anticipated[20], [21] and, if a clinical study is entertained, then reliable data can be obtained.

Decompressive surgery for CSM has been the treatment of choice for many patients.

Neurological improvement has been documented

Conclusion

Our study documents that anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion for CSM appears to be a more effective procedure with a more favorable neurological outcome when compared to posterior decompressive laminectomy, minimally invasive procedures and/or non-surgical treatment. It is also a safe procedure in the elderly,[25], [28], [29], [39] carrying low morbidity with the potential of permanent spinal cord decompression and excellent stability.

In our study population we found no statistical evidence

References (39)

  • W.R. Brain et al.

    The neurological manifestation of cervical spondylosis

    Brain

    (1952)
  • S. Nurick

    The pathogenesis of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis

    Brain

    (1972)
  • S. Nurick

    The natural history and the results of surgical treatment of the spinal cord disorder associated with cervical spondylosis

    Brain

    (1972)
  • M.J. Ebersold et al.

    Surgical treatment for cervical spondylitic myelopathy

    J Neurosurg

    (1995)
  • K. Abumi et al.

    Surgical treatment of cervical destructive spondyloarthropathy (DSA)

    Spine

    (2000)
  • D. Grob

    Surgery in the degenerative cervical spine

    Spine

    (1998)
  • K. Hanai et al.

    Anterior decompression for myelopathy resulting from thoracic ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

    Spine

    (2002)
  • K. Chiba et al.

    Development of new surgical treatments in spinal surgery: expansive open-door laminoplasty and percutaneous nucleotomy

    Keio J Med

    (2001)
  • C.C. Edwards et al.

    Corpectomy versus laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: an independent matched-cohort analysis

    Spine

    (2002)
  • M. Kawakami et al.

    A comparative study of surgical approaches for cervical compressive myelopathy

    Clin Orthop

    (2000)
  • T. Matsuoka et al.

    Long-term results of the anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

    Spine

    (2001)
  • T. Tani et al.

    Relative safety of anterior microsurgical decompression versus laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy with a massive ossified posterior longitudinal ligament

    Spine

    (2002)
  • K. Tomita et al.

    Cervical laminoplasty to enlarge the spinal canal in multilevel ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament with myelopathy

    Arch Orthop Trauma Surg

    (1988)
  • I. Yamaura et al.

    Anterior floating method for cervical myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

    Clin Orthop

    (1999)
  • Y. Morio et al.

    Correlation between operative outcomes of cervical compression myelopathy and MRI of the spinal cord

    Spine

    (2001)
  • T. Tominaga et al.

    Quantitative assessment of surgical decompression of the cervical spine with cine phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging

    Neurosurgery

    (2002)
  • Z.L. Gokaslan et al.

    Intraoperative monitoring of spinal cord function using motor evoked potentials via transcutaneous epidural electrode during anterior cervical spinal surgery

    J Spinal Disord

    (1997)
  • S. Kondo et al.

    Hypertrophy of the posterior longitudinal ligament is a prodromal condition to ossification: a cervical myelopathy case report

    Spine

    (2001)
  • M.H. Schmidt et al.

    Cervical myelopathy associated with degenerative spine disease and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament

    Semin Neurol

    (2002)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: When and Why the Cervical Corpectomy?

      2020, World Neurosurgery
      Citation Excerpt :

      Moreover, most investigators compared the results of all approaches performed (e.g., anterior discectomy, corpectomy, posterior laminectomy) without clear distinctions. All these aspects could have weakened the accuracy and significance of the reported results.6-41 At our institute, we performed a study exclusively focused on analyzing the effect of a single surgical technique commonly used for the treatment of CSM: cervical corpectomy.

    • Significant Predictors of Outcome Following Surgery for the Treatment of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Systematic Review of the Literature

      2018, Neurosurgery Clinics of North America
      Citation Excerpt :

      Twelve studies used postoperative or change in mJOA or JOA as the primary outcome measure. Of these, 8 reported an insignificant association between age and surgical outcome.25,30,33,38–42 In contrast, studies by Su and colleagues,43 Furlan and colleagues,44 and Floeth and colleagues45 identified age as a significant predictor of either postoperative JOA or mJOA or change in JOA scores.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text