Original contributionEvaluation of vertebral artery hypoplasia and asymmetry by color-coded duplex ultrasonography
Introduction
Variations in normal anatomy in the extracranial vertebral artery (VA) are relatively frequent, ranging from asymmetry of both VAs to significant hypoplasia of one VA. It has been recognized that the left VA diameter is often larger than the right VA diameter. In a post mortem study, the left VA was larger in 42%, the right VA larger in 32% and the VAs approximately equal in 26% (Krayenbuhl and Yasargil 1957). In an angiographic study, the left VA was wider in 61%, the right VA wider in 33% and both VAs equal in only 6% (Kazui et al. 1989). In duplex sonographic studies, the average VA diameter was more often larger on the left side than on the right side (Bartels et al., 1992, Yuan et al., 1994, Schöning et al., 1994, Seidel et al., 1999). Thus, the blood flow volume assessed by duplex sonography demonstrated higher blood flow volume in the left VA than in the right VA (Schöning et al., 1994, Seidel et al., 1999).
Up to now, there has been no agreement concerning the definition of VA hypoplasia, although several have been proposed by some authors (Bartels, 1999, Steinke, 2001). In a pathoanatomical study, VA hypoplasia was defined as a decrease in lumen diameter below 2 mm (Fisher et al. 1965). This definition of VA hypoplasia was confirmed by an ultrasonographic study that revealed a decrease in blood flow velocity in VAs with diameters less than 2 mm, based on a hypoplasia rate of 1.9% (Delcke and Diener 1992). A definition of VA hypoplasia as a lumen diameter below 3 mm was proposed after another ultrasonographic study of 50 healthy subjects, with the hypoplasia rate being 6% (Touboul et al. 1986). Bartels suggested that a VA is hypoplastic if the diameter is smaller than 3 mm and the Doppler spectrum shows a high resistive pattern (Bartels 1999).
To differentiate between hypoplasia and stenosis of the VA is important clinically. There is no requirement to do more expensive or aggressive studies, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or conventional angiography in the differential diagnosis of VA stenosis if hypoplasia of the VA is documented ultrasonographically. In addition, the differentiation between hypoplasia and stenosis of the VA can guide decision-making regarding choice of intervention in symptomatic VA stenosis.
The aim of this study was threefold: 1. To characterize the distribution of normal VA hemodynamics by duplex color Doppler ultrasonography (CDU); 2. to analyze the influence of age, gender, and side on hemodynamics; and 3. to propose a definition of VA hypoplasia.
Section snippets
Materials and methods
A total of 447 subjects (231 men, 216 women), ages 54.4 ± 12.0 years (ranging from 16 to 87 years) enrolled in our study during the year 2002. Subjects were either patients with nonspecific neurologic complaints, such as headache, neck pain, dizziness, syncope or memory impairment, or they were subjects receiving physical check-ups. Patients who had a history or signs of cerebrovascular disease or carotid stenosis greater than 15%, or VA total occlusion, were excluded. CDU was performed with a
Results
In all 447 subjects, the V2 segment of the VA was well-visualized on both sides sonographically. The results of mean age and sonographic parameters of the VA for both sides in men and women are shown in Table 1. Compared with men, women had a significantly smaller diameter of the VA, higher flow velocities and lower RI. However, the right or left or net VA flow volume did not differ significantly between men and women.
The correlations of age with these sonographic parameters of the VA are
Discussion
Congenital variations in the size and symmetry of the posterior circulation are well recognized. Recently, hypoplasia of the VA and the basilar artery has been investigated for possible increased risk of posterior circulation ischemia (Chaturvedi et al. 1999) and migraine with aura (Lovrencic-Huzjan et al. 1998). In addition, it is important in clinical practice to differentiate between hypoplasia and steno-occlusion of the VA. Ultrasonography of the extracranial VA is useful, owing to its
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by the research grant from the National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC-92-2314-B-002-243). The authors thank Bao-Show Hwang and Win-Hwen Lin for their technical assistance in ultrasonography.
References (24)
- et al.
Vertebrobasilar insufficiencyEvaluation by quantitative duplex flow measurements
J Vasc Surg
(1987) - et al.
Duplex scanning in presumably normal persons of different ages
Ultrasound Med Biol
(1986) - et al.
Duplex ultrasonography of vertebral arteriesExamination, technique, normal values, and clinical application
Angiology
(1992) Vertebral sonography
- et al.
Measurement of anterior and posterior circulation flow contributions to cerebral blood flow
J Neuroimaging
(1995) - et al.
Ischemia in the territory of a hypoplastic vertebrobasilar system
Neurology
(1999) - et al.
Die verschiedenen Ultraschallmethoden zur Untersuchung der Arteria vertebralis – eine vergleichende Wertung
Ultraschall Med
(1992) - et al.
Ultrasonic quantitative flow volumetry of the carotid arteriesInitial experience with a color flow m-mode system
Cerebrovasc Dis
(1995) - et al.
Atherosclerosis of the carotid and vertebral arteries—Extracranial and intracranial
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol
(1965) - et al.
Estimation of vertebral arterial asymmetry by computed tomography
Neuroradiology
(1989)
Ultrasonographic evaluation of vertebral artery to detect vertebrobasilar axis occlusion
Stroke
Cited by (148)
Asymmetry in circulation system and cardiovascular diseases
2024, Medicine in Novel Technology and DevicesPredictors of Multi‐Vessel Identification, Outcome, and Optimal Surgical Timing for Microvascular Decompression in Hemifacial Spasm
2023, Clinical Neurology and NeurosurgeryCerebral Arterial Growth in Childhood
2022, Pediatric NeurologyAn association between vertebral artery dominance and steno-occlusion of the vertebral artery segments: A retrospective angiographic study
2021, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience