Elsevier

Epilepsy & Behavior

Volume 45, April 2015, Pages 49-52
Epilepsy & Behavior

Parental reporting of response to oral cannabis extracts for treatment of refractory epilepsy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.02.043Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Parents in our study reported a 33% response to OCE.

  • Relocating to Colorado had a significant effect on response rates.

  • The response rate is similar to previously reported placebo response rates.

  • Reported response was not correlated with improved background EEG data.

  • Parents reported a variety of additional benefits of OCE and adverse reactions.

Abstract

Objective

Oral cannabis extracts (OCEs) have been used in the treatment of epilepsy; however, no studies demonstrate clear efficacy. We report on a cohort of pediatric patients with epilepsy who were given OCE and followed in a single tertiary epilepsy center.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of children and adolescents who were given OCE for treatment of their epilepsy was performed.

Results

Seventy-five patients were identified of which 57% reported any improvement in seizure control and 33% reported a > 50% reduction in seizures (responders). If the family had moved to CO for OCE treatment, the responder rate was 47% vs. 22% for children who already were in CO. The responder rate varied based on epilepsy syndrome: Dravet 23%, Doose 0%, and Lennox–Gastaut syndrome (LGS) 88.9%. The background EEG of the 8 responders where EEG data were available was not improved. Additional benefits reported included: improved behavior/alertness (33%), improved language (10%), and improved motor skills (10%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 44% of patients including increased seizures (13%) and somnolence/fatigue (12%). Rare adverse events included developmental regression, abnormal movements, status epilepticus requiring intubation, and death.

Significance

Our retrospective study of OCE use in pediatric patients with epilepsy demonstrates that some families reported patient improvement with treatment; however, we also found a variety of challenges and possible confounding factors in studying OCE retrospectively in an open-labeled fashion. We strongly support the need for controlled, blinded studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OCE for treatment of pediatric epilepsies using accurate seizure counts, formal neurocognitive assessments, as well as EEG as a biomarker. This study provides Class III evidence that OCE is well tolerated by children and adolescents with epilepsy.

Introduction

Epilepsy affects over 65 million people worldwide and approximately 2.3 million in the United States [1]. Approximately 1/3 of those have medically refractory epilepsy. Despite decades of research and the continued discovery of new antiseizure medications, seizures in many patients remain unresponsive to medical therapy. Many families choose to try nonpharmaceutical or alternative therapy options. Recently, there has been a surge of interest in the use of marijuana or Cannabis sativa and its extracted components. This interest has been fueled in part by recent media coverage of a specific strain of Cannabis reported to be high in cannabidiol (CBD) that is thought to be less psychoactive than strains containing higher levels of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), the major psychoactive component of cannabis.

A recent review analyzed four controlled studies which evaluated the role of CBD in seizure treatment, all of which had significant methodological flaws, and no benefit of CBD could be identified [2]. In a recent survey of parents of 19 children who were given CBD, more than 50% reported a dramatic decrease in seizures with no severe side effects [3]. There is also evidence that chronic marijuana use leads to a decline in cognitive function that may not be reversible [4], [5].

Following favorable media coverage, OCE use has increased significantly in Colorado (CO). As part of the legislation, patients must have established residency in CO prior to initiating OCE treatment, leading to many patients moving from other states to establish care. The experience of a cohort of pediatric patients with epilepsy who were given OCE is reported.

Section snippets

Subjects

We performed a retrospective chart review of children known to the neurology service at the Children's Hospital of Colorado who have trialed any OCE through July 2014. Children were included if they had epilepsy defined by the healthcare provider and a documented seizure frequency prior to starting OCE treatment. Additional inclusion criteria were a documented seizure frequency after initiating OCE treatment and documentation of at least two points of contact with a provider. Ages included were

Results

Seventy-five patients were identified and met inclusion criteria. Thirty-four were male (45.3%), and thirty-four had moved to CO to obtain OCE (45.3%). The average age was 7.33 years (6 months to 18.25 years) when starting OCE treatment (Table 1). There were a variety of epilepsy syndromes in our cohort including Dravet, Doose and Lennox–Gastaut, as well as a variety of seizure types (Table 2).

Of the 75 patients, the parents of 43 (57%) reported at least some improvement in seizures. Twenty-five

Discussion

In this retrospective cohort, 33% of patients were reported to have a reduction in seizure frequency of more than 50% in response to OCE by parental report (i.e., responder rate of 33%), and these responses were not associated with an improvement in interictal EEG when available. However, there was a significant discrepancy in responder rate between patients with preexisting residency in the state of Colorado and patients who moved to Colorado for the purpose of obtaining OCE treatment (22% to

Conclusion

Our retrospective study of OCE use in pediatric patients with epilepsy demonstrates that some families reported patient improvement with treatment; however, we also found a variety of challenges and possible confounding factors in studying OCE retrospectively in an open-labeled fashion. We strongly support the need for controlled, blinded studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of OCE for treatment of pediatric epilepsies using accurate seizure counts, formal neurocognitive assessments, as

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our patients and their families for allowing us to care for and learn from them. We would like to thank Dr. Amy Brooks-Kayal for her review of the manuscript, guidance and support. Victoria Allen assisted with statistical analysis which is greatly appreciated.

Disclosure of conflicts of interest

None of the authors have any conflict of interest to disclose.

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (196)

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text