Abstract
Dopamine receptor agonists are indicated for the symptomatic treatment of early, moderate or advanced Parkinson’s disease as well as for the reduction of levodopa-related motor complications. Ergolinic dopamine agonists, such as bromocriptine or pergolide, were initially developed and marketed, and then non-ergolinic dopamine agonists, such as pramipexole and ropinirole, were introduced, reducing the risk of drug-induced fibrotic reactions. Once-daily, controlled-release oral and transdermal formulations have been developed aiming at providing more stable 24-hour plasma drug concentrations and more convenient administration. A disease-modifying effect of dopamine agonists has not been demonstrated clinically.
As with any other drug, dopamine agonists can also cause adverse drug reactions, which can be related or unrelated to dopaminergic hyperactivation. Dopaminergic reactions include nausea, hallucinations, confusion and orthostatic hypotension, among others, which were readily identified in pre-marketing clinical trials. During post-marketing surveillance, important adverse reactions were identified, such as daytime somnolence, impulse-control disorders and heart valve fibrosis. Other issues, including the efficacy of dopamine agonists for the treatment of non-motor symptoms, remain under evaluation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O. The effect of l–3,4-dihy-droxyphenylalanine (=DOPA) on akinesia in parkinsonism. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 1998; 4: 59–60
Nutt JG. Levodopa-induced dyskinesia: review, observations, and speculations. Neurology 1990; 40: 340–5
Rascol O, Payoux P, Ory F, et al. Limitations of current Parkinson’s disease therapy. Ann Neurol 2003; 53 Suppl. 3: S3–12
Calne DB, Teychenne PF, Leigh PN, et al. Treatment of parkinsonism with bromocriptine. Lancet 1974; 2: 1355–6
Deleu D, Northway MG, Hanssens Y. Clinical pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of drugs used in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41: 261–309
Olanow CW, Stern MB, Sethi K. The scientific and clinical basis for the treatment of Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009;72:S1–136
Kvernmo T, Hartter S, Burger E. A review of the receptor-binding and pharmacokinetic properties of dopamine agonists. Clin Ther 2006; 28: 1065–78
Montastruc JL, Rascol O, Senard JM. Current status of dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease management. Drugs 1993; 46: 384–93
Johnston TH, Fox SH, Brotchie JM. Advances in the delivery of treatments for Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2005; 2: 1059–73
LeWitt PA. Subcutaneously administered apomorphine: pharmacokinetics and metabolism. Neurology 2004; 62: S8–11
Neef C, van Laar T. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of apomorphine in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Pharmacokinet 1999; 37: 257–71
Fariello RG. Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic features of cabergoline: rationale for use in Parkinson’s disease. Drugs 1998; 55 Suppl. 1: 10–6
Albanese A, Colosimo C. Dihydroergocriptine in Parkinson’s disease: clinical efficacy and comparison with other dopamine agonists. Acta Neurol Scand 2003; 107: 349–55
Biglan KM, Holloway RG. A review of pramipexole and its clinical utility in Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2002; 3: 197–210
Blin O. The pharmacokinetics of pergolide in Parkinson’s disease. Curr Opin Neurol 2003; 16 Suppl. 1: S9–12
Curran MP, Perry CM. Cabergoline: a review of its use in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Drugs 2004; 64: 2125–41
Marco AD, Appiah-Kubi LS, Chaudhuri KR. Use of the dopamine agonist cabergoline in the treatment of movement disorders. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2002; 3:1481–7
Matheson AJ, Spencer CM. Ropinirole: a review of its use in the management of Parkinson’s disease. Drugs 2000; 60: 115–37
Jenner P, Könen-Bergman M, Schepers C, et al. Pharmacokinetics of a once-daily extended-release formulation of pramipexole in healthy male volunteers: three studies. Clin Ther 2009; 31(11): 2698–711
Tompson DJ, Vearer D. Steady-state pharmacokinetic properties of a 24-hour prolonged-release formulation of ropinirole: results of two randomized studies in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Ther 2007; 29: 2654–66
Rascol O, Perez-Lloret S. Rotigotine transdermal delivery for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2009; 10: 677–91
U.S. FDA. FDA approved drug products [online]. Available from URL: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/index.cfm [Accessed 2009 Dec 22]
Weber J, Keating GM. Ropinirole prolonged release: in advanced Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 2009; 23: 81–90
Schapira AH, Albrecht S, Barone P, et al. Inmediate vs delayed-start pramipexole in early Parkinson’s disease: the PROUD study [abstract]. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2009; 15S2: S81
Hauser RA, Rascol O, Barone P, et al. Pharmacokinetic profiling of pramipexole extended-release in Parkinson’s disease patients: implication for dosing in PD patients with renal insufficiency [abstract]. Mov Disord 2009; 24 Suppl. 1: S265–6
Kaye CM, Nicholls B. Clinical pharmacokinetics of ropinirole. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000; 39: 243–54
Cawello W, Braun M, Boekens H. Absorption, disposition, metabolic fate, and elimination of the dopamine agonist rotigotine in man: administration by intravenous infusion or transdermal delivery. Drug Metab Dispos 2009; 37: 2055–60
Cawello W, Wolff HM, Meuling WJ, et al. Transdermal administration of radiolabelled [14C]rotigotine by a patch formulation: a mass balance trial. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007; 46: 851–7
Piercey MF, Hoffmann WE, Smith MW, et al. Inhibition of dopamine neuron firing by pramipexole, a dopamine D3 receptor-preferring agonist: comparison to other dopamine receptor agonists. Eur J Pharmacol 1996; 312: 35–44
Piercey MF. Pharmacology of pramipexole, a dopamine D3-preferring agonist useful in treating Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1998; 21: 141–51
Antonini A, Poewe W. Fibrotic heart-valve reactions to dopamine-agonist treatment in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 826–9
Tulloch IF. Pharmacologic profile of ropinirole: a non-ergoline dopamine agonist. Neurology 1997; 49: S58–62
Luquin MR, Laguna J, Obeso JA. Selective D2 receptor stimulation induces dyskinesia in parkinsonian monkeys. Ann Neurol 1992; 31: 551–4
Robertson HA. Dopamine receptor interactions: some implications for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Trends Neurosci 1992; 15: 201–6
Gomez-Mancilla B, Bedard PJ. Effect of chronic treatment with (+)-PHNO, a D2 agonist in MPTP-treated monkeys. Exp Neurol 1992; 117: 185–8
Grondin R, Bedard PJ, Britton DR, et al. Potential therapeutic use of the selective dopamine D1 receptor agonist, A-86929: an acute study in parkinsonian levodopa-primed monkeys. Neurology 1997; 49: 421–6
Rascol O, Nutt JG, Blin O, et al. Induction by dopamine D1 receptor agonist ABT-431 of dyskinesia similar to levodopa in patients with Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 249–54
Wise RA, Rompre PP. Brain dopamine and reward. Annu Rev Psychol 1989; 40: 191–225
Maj J, Rogoz Z, Skuza G, et al. Antidepressant effects of pramipexole, a novel dopamine receptor agonist. J Neural Transm 1997; 104: 525–33
Montastruc JL, Rascol A. Treatment of Parkinson’s disease with high doses of bromocriptine: possible interaction with josamycin [in French]. Presse Med 1984; 13: 2267–8
Periti P, Mazzei T, Mini E, et al. Pharmacokinetic drug interactions of macrolides. Clin Pharmacokinet 1992; 23: 106–31
Fahn S, Elton RL, members of the UPDRS committee. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Mardsen CD, Golstein M, Calne DB, editors. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. New York: McMillan, 1987: 153–63
Goetz CG, Poewe W, Rascol O, et al. Evidence-based medical review update: pharmacological and surgical treatments of Parkinson’s disease: 2001 to 2004. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 523–39
Rascol O, Goetz C, Koller W, et al. Treatment interventions for Parkinson’s disease: an evidence based assessment. Lancet 2002; 359: 1589–98
Staal-Schreinemachers AL, Wesseling H, Kamphuis DJ, et al. Low-dose bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson’s disease: double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Neurology 1986; 36: 291–3
Parkinson’s Disease Research Group in the United Kingdom. Comparisons of therapeutic effects of levodopa, levodopa and selegiline, and bromocriptine in patients with early, mild Parkinson’s disease: three year interim report: Parkinson’s Disease Research Group in the United Kingdom. BMJ 1993; 307: 469–72
Przuntek H, Welzel D, Gerlach M, et al. Early institution of bromocriptine in Parkinson’s disease inhibits the emergence of levodopa-associated motor side effects: long-term results of the PRADO study. J Neural Transm 1996; 103: 699–715
Katzenschlager R, Head J, Schrag A, et al. Fourteen-year final report of the randomized PDRG-UK trial comparing three initial treatments in PD. Neurology 2008; 71:474–80
Montastruc JL, Rascol O, Senard JM, et al. A randomised controlled study comparing bromocriptine to which levodopa was later added, with levodopa alone in previously untreated patients with Parkinson’s disease: a five year follow up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57:1034–8
Alarcon F, Cevallos N, Lees AJ. Does combined levodopa and bromocriptine therapy in Parkinson’s disease prevent late motor complications? Eur J Neurol 1998; 5: 255–63
Stowe RL, Ives NJ, Clarke C, et al. Dopamine agonist therapy in early Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (16): CD006564
Herskovits E, Yorio A, Leston J. Long term bromocriptine treatment in de novo Parkinsonian patients. Medicina (B Aires) 1988; 48: 345–50
Bakheit AM, Henderson LM, Moore AP, et al. Long-term double masked trial of early treatment with L-dopa plus bromocriptine versus L-dopa alone in Parkinson’s disease: interim results. Eur Neurol 1990; 30: 108–11
Olsson JE, European Multicentric Trial Group. Bromocriptine and levodopa in early combination in Parkinson’s disease: first results of the Collaborative European Multicentric Trial. In: Streifler MB, Korczyn AD, Melamed E, et al. editors. Advances in neurology. Vol 53. Parkinson’s disease: anatomy, pathology, and therapy. New York: Raven Press, 1990
Gimenez-Roldan S, Tolosa E, Burguera JA, et al. Early combination of bromocriptine and levodopa in Parkinson’s disease: a prospective randomized study of two parallel groups over a total follow-up period of 44 months including an initial 8-month double-blind stage. Clin Neuropharmacol 1997; 20: 67–76
Olanow CW, Hauser RA, Gauger L, et al. The effect of deprenyl and levodopa on the progression of Parkinson’s disease. Ann Neurol 1995; 38: 771–7
Bracco F, Battaglia A, Chouza C, et al. The long-acting dopamine receptor agonist cabergoline in early Parkinson’s disease: final results of a 5-year, double-blind, levo-dopa-controlled study. CNS Drugs 2004; 18: 733–46
Rinne UK, Bracco F, Chouza C, et al. Early treatment of Parkinson’s disease with cabergoline delays the onset of motor complications: results of a double-blind levodopa controlled trial. The PKDS009 Study Group. Drugs 1998; 55 Suppl. 1: 23–30
Rinne UK, Bracco F, Chouza C, et al. Cabergoline in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease: results of the first year of treatment in a double-blind comparison of cabergoline and levodopa. The PKDS009 Collaborative Study Group. Neurology 1997; 48: 363–8
Bergamasco B, Frattola L, Muratorio A, et al. Alpha-dihydroergocryptine in the treatment of de novo parkinsonian patients: results of a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Acta Neurol Scand 2000; 101: 372–80
Rinne UK. Lisuride, a dopamine agonist in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1989; 39: 336–9
Allain H, Destee A, Petit H, et al. Five-year follow-up of early lisuride and levodopa combination therapy versus levodopa monotherapy in de novo Parkinson’s disease: the French Lisuride Study Group. Eur Neurol 2000; 44: 22–30
Mizuno Y, Kondo T, Narabayashi H. Pergolide in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1995; 45: S13–21
Barone P, Bravi D, Bermejo-Pareja F, et al. Pergolide monotherapy in the treatment of early PD: a randomized, controlled study. Pergolide Monotherapy Study Group. Neurology 1999; 53: 573–9
Oertel WH, Wolters E, Sampaio C, et al. Pergolide versus levodopa monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease patients: the PELMOPET study. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 343–53
Grosset K, Grosset D, Lees A. Trial of subtherapeutic pergolide in de novo Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 363–6
Rascol O, Dubois B, Caldas AC, et al. Early piribedil monotherapy of Parkinson’s disease: a planned seven-month report of the REGAIN study. Mov Disord 2006; 21:2110–5
Hubble JP, Koller WC, Cutler NR, et al. Pramipexole in patients with early Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1995; 18: 338–47
Shannon KM, Bennett Jr JP, Friedman JH. Efficacy of pramipexole, a novel dopamine agonist, as monotherapy in mild to moderate Parkinson’s disease: the Pramipexole Study Group. Neurology 1997; 49: 724–8
Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. Parkinson Study Group. JAMA 2000; 284: 1931–8
Pogarell O, Gasser T, van Hilten JJ, et al. Pramipexole in patients with Parkinson’s disease and marked drug resistant tremor: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002; 72: 713–20
Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. Long-term effect of initiating pramipexole vs levodopa in early Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2009; 66: 563–70
Poewe WH, Barone P, Hauser RA, et al. Pramipexole extended-release is effective in early Parkinson’s disease [abstract]. Mov Disord 2009; 24 Suppl. 1: S273
Schapira AH, Barone P, Hauser RA, et al. Efficacy and safety of pramipexole extended-release for advanced Parkinson’s disease [abstract]. Mov Disord 2009; 24 Suppl. 1: S277–8
Adler CH, Sethi KD, Hauser RA, et al. Ropinirole for the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease: the Ropinirole Study Group. Neurology 1997; 49: 393–9
Brooks DJ, Abbott RJ, Lees AJ, et al. A placebo-controlled evaluation of ropinirole, a novel D2 agonist, as sole dop-aminergic therapy in Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1998; 21: 101–7
Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Brunt ER, et al. Ropinirole in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease: a 6-month interim report of a 5-year levodopa-controlled study. 056 Study Group. Mov Disord 1998; 13: 39–45
Korczyn AD, Brunt ER, Larsen JP, et al. A 3-year randomized trial of ropinirole and bromocriptine in early Parkinson’s disease: the 053 Study Group. Neurology 1999; 53: 364–70
Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, et al. A five-year study of the incidence of dyskinesia in patients with early Parkinson’s disease who were treated with ropinirole or levodopa: 056 Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1484–91
Schrag A, Keens J, Warner J. Ropinirole for the treatment of tremor in early Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 2002; 9: 253–7
Whone AL, Watts RL, Stoessl AJ, et al. Slower progression of Parkinson’s disease with ropinirole versus levodopa: the REAL-PET study. Ann Neurol 2003; 54: 93–101
Rascol O, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, et al. Development of dyskinesias in a 5-year trial of ropinirole and L-dopa. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 1844–50
Hauser RA, Rascol O, Korczyn AD, et al. Ten-year follow-up of Parkinson’s disease patients randomized to initial therapy with ropinirole or levodopa. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 2409–17
Stocchi F, Hersh BP, Scott BL, et al. Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release and ropinirole immediate release in early Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority crossover study. Curr Med Res Opin 2008; 24: 2883–95
Giladi N, Boroojerdi B, Korczyn AD, et al. Rotigotine transdermal patch in early Parkinson’s disease: a randomized, double-blind, controlled study versus placebo and ropinirole. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 2398–404
Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. A controlled trial of rotigotine monotherapy in early Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 2003; 60: 1721–8
Jankovic J, Watts RL, Martin W, et al. Transdermal rotigotine: double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 676–82
Riopelle RJ. Bromocriptine and the clinical spectrum of Parkinson’s disease. Can J Neurol Sci 1987; 14: 455–9
Rascol O, Barone P, Debieuvre C, et al. Easy switching from immediate- to extended-release pramipexole in early Parkinson’s disease at the same daily dosage [abstract]. Mov Disord 2009; 24 Suppl. 1: S362
Korczyn AD, Brooks DJ, Brunt ER, et al. Ropinirole versus bromocriptine in the treatment of early Parkinson’s disease: a 6-month interim report of a 3-year study. 053 Study Group. Mov Disord 1998; 13: 46–51
Parkinson’s Disease Study Group. A controlled trial of rasagiline in early Parkinson disease: the TEMPO Study. Arch Neurol 2002; 59: 1937–43
The Parkinson Study Group. Effect of deprenyl on the progression of disability in early Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 1364–71
Dewey Jr RB, Hutton JT, LeWitt PA, et al. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneously injected apomorphine for parkinsonian off-state events. Arch Neurol 2001; 58: 1385–92
Inzelberg R, Nisipeanu P, Rabey JM, et al. Double-blind comparison of cabergoline and bromocriptine in Parkinson’s disease patients with motor fluctuations. Neurology 1996; 47: 785–8
Hutton JT, Koller WC, Ahlskog JE, et al. Multicenter, placebo-controlled trial of cabergoline taken once daily in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1996; 46: 1062–5
Olanow CW, Fahn S, Muenter M, et al. A multicenter double-blind placebo-controlled trial of pergolide as an adjunct to Sinemet in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 1994; 9: 40–7
Pezzoli G, Martignoni E, Pacchetti C, et al. Pergolide compared with bromocriptine in Parkinson’s disease: a multicenter, crossover, controlled study. Mov Disord 1994; 9: 431–6
Ziegler M, Castro-Caldas A, Del SS, et al. Efficacy of piribedil as early combination to levodopa in patients with stable Parkinson’s disease: a 6-month, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 418–25
Castro-Caldas A, Delwaide P, Jost W, et al. The Parkinson-Control study: a 1-year randomized, double-blind trial comparing piribedil (150 mg/day) with bromocriptine (25 mg/day) in early combination with levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2006; 21: 500–9
Pinter MM, Pogarell O, Oertel WH. Efficacy, safety, and tolerance of the non-ergoline dopamine agonist prami-pexole in the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double blind, placebo controlled, randomised, multicentre study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 436–41
Mizuno Y, Yanagisawa N, Kuno S, et al. Randomized, double-blind study of pramipexole with placebo and bromocriptine in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 1149–56
Lieberman A, Ranhosky A, Korts D. Clinical evaluation of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson’s disease: results of a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study. Neurology 1997; 49(1): 162–8
Clarke CE, Speller JM, Clarke JA. Pramipexole for levo-dopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (3): CD002261
Wermuth L, Danish Pramipexole Study Group. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, multi-center study of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Eur J Neurol 1998; 5: 235–42
Murayama S, Narabayashi H, Kowa H, et al. Clinical evaluation of ropinirole hydrochloride in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind comparative study versus bromocriptine mesylate. Japan Pharmacol Ther 1996; 24: 1939–2007
Clarke CE, Deane KH. Ropinirole versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (3): CD001517
Mizuno Y, Abe T, Hasegawa K, et al. Ropinirole is effective on motor function when used as an adjunct to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease: STRONG study. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 1860–5
Lieberman A, Olanow CW, Sethi K, et al. A multicenter trial of ropinirole as adjunct treatment for Parkinson’s disease: Ropinirole Study Group. Neurology 1998; 51: 1057–62
Clarke CE, Deane KH. Ropinirole for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (1): CD001516
Brunt ER, Brooks DJ, Korczyn AD, et al. A six-month multicentre, double-blind, bromocriptine-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of ropinirole in the treatment of patients with Parkinson’s disease not optimally controlled by L-dopa. J Neural Transm 2002; 109: 489–502
Guttman M. Double-blind comparison of pramipexole and bromocriptine treatment with placebo in advanced Parkinson’s disease: International Pramipexole-Bromocriptine Study Group. Neurology 1997; 49: 1060–5
Moller JC, Oertel WH, Koster J, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of pramipexole in advanced Parkinson’s disease: results from a European multicenter trial. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 602–10
Martignoni E, Pacchetti C, Sibilla L, et al. Dihydroergocryptine in the treatment of Parkinson’s disease: a six months’ double-blind clinical trial. Clin Neuropharmacol 1991; 14: 78–83
Navan P, Findley LJ, Undy MB, et al. A randomly assigned double-blind cross-over study examining the relative anti-parkinsonian tremor effects of pramipexole and pergolide. Eur J Neurol 2005; 12: 1–8
LeWitt PA, Lyons KE, Pahwa R. Advanced Parkinson disease treated with rotigotine transdermal system: PREFER Study. Neurology 2007; 68: 1262–7
Poewe WH, Rascol O, Quinn N, et al. Efficacy of pramipexole and transdermal rotigotine in advanced Parkinson’s disease: a double-blind, double-dummy, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol 2007; 6: 513–20
Laihinen A, Rinne UK, Suchy I. Comparison of lisuride and bromocriptine in the treatment of advanced Parkinson’s disease. Acta Neurol Scand 1992; 86: 593–5
LeWitt PA, Gopinathan G, Ward CD, et al. Lisuride versus bromocriptine treatment in Parkinson disease: a double-blind study. Neurology 1982; 32: 69–72
LeWitt PA, Ward CD, Larsen TA, et al. Comparison of pergolide and bromocriptine therapy in parkinsonism. Neurology 1983; 33: 1009–14
Tolcapone Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of tolcapone compared with bromocriptine in levodopa-treated parkinsonian patients. Mov Disord 1999; 14: 38–44
Koller W, Lees A, Doder M, et al. Randomized trial of tolcapone versus pergolide as add-on to levodopa therapy in Parkinson’s disease patients with motor fluctuations. Mov Disord 2001; 16: 858–66
Kumar N, Van Gerpen JA, Bower JH, et al. Levodopa-dyskinesia incidence by age of Parkinson’s disease onset. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 342–4
Hely MA, Morris JG, Reid WG, et al. The Sydney Multi-centre Study of Parkinson’s disease: a randomised, prospective five year study comparing low dose bromocriptine with low dose levodopa-carbidopa. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1994; 57: 903–10
Hely MA, Morris JG, Reid WG, et al. Sydney Multicenter Study of Parkinson’s disease: non-L-dopa-responsive problems dominate at 15 years. Mov Disord 2005; 20:190–9
Stocchi F, Kakarieka A, Kieburtz K, et al. The STRIDE-PD study: late breaking abstracts. 13th International Congress of Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders [online]. Available from URL: http://www.movementdisorders.org/congress/congress09/late_breaking_abstracts.pdf [Accessed 2009 Dec 1]
Hauser RA, Friedlander J, Zesiewicz TA, et al. A home diary to assess functional status in patients with Parkinson’s disease with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia. Clin Neuropharmacol 2000; 23: 75–81
Clarke CE, Speller JM. Pergolide versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000236
Clarke CE, Speller JM. Pergolide for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2): CD000235
Rascol O, Lees AJ, Senard JM, et al. Ropinirole in the treatment of levodopa-induced motor fluctuations in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Clin Neuropharmacol 1996; 19: 234–45
Pahwa R, Stacy MA, Factor SA, et al. Ropinirole 24-hour prolonged release: randomized, controlled study in advanced Parkinson disease. Neurology 2007; 68: 1108–15
Ostergaard L, Werdelin L, Odin P, et al. Pen injected apomorphine against off phenomena in late Parkinson’s disease: a double blind, placebo controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995; 58: 681–7
Katzenschlager R, Hughes A, Evans A, et al. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine therapy improves dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease: a prospective study using single-dose challenges. Mov Disord 2005; 20: 151–7
Garcia Ruiz PJ, Sesar IA, Ares PB, et al. Efficacy of long-term continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusion in advanced Parkinson’s disease with motor fluctuations: a multicenter study. Mov Disord 2008; 23: 1130–6
Yanagisawa N, Kowa H, Mizuno Y, et al. The clinical evaluation of CG-101 (cabergoline) in Parkinson’s disease patients with L-DOPA: a multi-centred phase III double-blind comparative study vs. bromocriptine mesilate. J Clin Ther Med 1996; 12(17): 12
Clarke CE, Deane KH. Cabergoline versus bromocriptine for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (1): CD001519
Steiger MJ, El-Debas T, Anderson T, et al. Double-blind study of the activity and tolerability of cabergoline versus placebo in parkinsonians with motor fluctuations. J Neurol 1996; 243: 68–72
Clarke CE, Deane KH. Cabergoline for levodopa-induced complications in Parkinson’s disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001; (1): CD001518
Deuschl G, Vaitkus A, Fox GC, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of entacapone versus cabergoline in parkinsonian patients suffering from wearing-off. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 1550–5
Im JH, Ha JH, Cho IS, et al. The efficacy and safety of ropinirole as an adjunct to levodopa in Korean patients with Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Relat Disord 1999; 5: S75
Hoehn MM, Elton RL. Low dosages of bromocriptine added to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1985; 35: 199–206
Toyokura Y, Mizuno Y, Kase M, et al. Effects of bromocriptine on parkinsonism: a nation-wide collaborative double-blind study. Acta Neurol Scand 1985; 72: 157–70
Stocchi F. Use of apomorphine in Parkinson’s disease. Neurol Sci 2008; 29 Suppl. 5: S383–6
Colzi A, Turner K, Lees AJ. Continuous subcutaneous waking day apomorphine in the long term treatment of levodopa induced interdose dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998; 64: 573–6
Manson AJ, Turner K, Lees AJ. Apomorphine monotherapy in the treatment of refractory motor complications of Parkinson’s disease: long-term follow-up study of 64 patients. Mov Disord 2002; 17: 1235–41
Facca A, Sanchez-Ramos J. High-dose pergolide monotherapy in the treatment of severe levodopa-induced dyskinesias. Mov Disord 1996; 11: 327–9
Cristina S, Zangaglia R, Mancini F, et al. High-dose ropinirole in advanced Parkinson’s disease with severe dyskinesias. Clin Neuropharmacol 2003; 26: 146–50
Chaudhuri KR, Schapira AH. Non-motor symptoms of Parkinson’s disease: dopaminergic pathophysiology and treatment. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 464–74
Corrigan MH, Denahan AQ, Wright CE, et al. Comparison of pramipexole, fluoxetine, and placebo in patients with major depression. Depress Anxiety 2000; 11: 58–65
Zarate Jr CA, Payne JL, Singh J, et al. Pramipexole for bipolar II depression: a placebo-controlled proof of concept study. Biol Psychiatry 2004; 56: 54–60
Izumi T, Inoue T, Kitagawa N, et al. Open pergolide treatment of tricyclic and heterocyclic antidepressant-resistant depression. J Affect Disord 2000; 61: 127–32
Lattanzi L, Dell’Osso L, Cassano P, et al. Pramipexole in treatment-resistant depression: a 16-week naturalistic study. Bipolar Disord 2002; 4: 307–14
Perugi G, Toni C, Ruffolo G, et al. Adjunctive dopamine agonists in treatment-resistant bipolar II depression: an open case series. Pharmacopsychiatry 2001; 34: 137–41
Rektorova I, Rektor I, Bares M, et al. Pramipexole and pergolide in the treatment of depression in Parkinson’s disease: a national multicentre prospective randomized study. Eur J Neurol 2003; 10: 399–406
Barone P, Scarzella L, Marconi R, et al. Pramipexole versus sertraline in the treatment of depression in Parkinson’s disease: a national multicenter parallel-group randomized study. J Neurol 2006; 253: 601–7
Barone P, Poewe W, Tolosa E, et al. Efficacy of double-blind, placebo-controlled pramipexole against depression in Parkinson’s disease [abstract]. Mov Disord 2009; 24 Suppl. 1: S347
Gallagher DA, Schrag A. Impact of newer pharmacological treatments on quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease. CNS Drugs 2008; 22: 563–86
Holloway RG, Shoulson I, Fahn S, et al. Pramipexole vs levodopa as initial treatment for Parkinson disease: a 4-year randomized controlled trial. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 1044–53
Noyes K, Dick AW, Holloway RG. Pramipexole versus levodopa in patients with early Parkinson’s disease: effect on generic and disease-specific quality of life. Value Health 2006; 9: 28–38
Rektorova I, Balaz M, Svatova J, et al. Effects of ropinirole on nonmotor symptoms of Parkinson disease: a prospective multicenter study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2008; 31: 261–6
Happe S, Berger K. The association of dopamine agonists with daytime sleepiness, sleep problems and quality of life in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a prospective study. J Neurol 2001; 248: 1062–7
Schapira AH. Molecular and clinical pathways to neuroprotection of dopaminergic drugs in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2009; 72: S44–50
Gerlach M, Double KL, Youdim MB, et al. Strategies for the protection of dopaminergic neurons against neurotoxicity. Neurotox Res 2000; 2: 99–114
Muralikrishnan D, Mohanakumar KP. Neuroprotection by bromocriptine against 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetra-hydropyridine-induced neurotoxicity in mice. FASEB J 1998; 12: 905–12
Ogawa N, Tanaka K, Asanuma M, et al. Bromocriptine protects mice against 6-hydroxydopamine and scavenges hydroxyl free radicals in vitro. Brain Res 1994; 657: 207–13
Clow A, Freestone C, Lewis E, et al. The effect of pergolide and MDL 72974 on rat brain CuZn superoxide dismutase. Neurosci Lett 1993; 164: 41–3
Kakimura J, Kitamura Y, Takata K, et al. Release and aggregation of cytochrome c and alpha-synuclein are inhibited by the antiparkinsonian drugs, talipexole and pramipexole. Eur J Pharmacol 2001; 417: 59–67
Gu M, Iravani MM, Cooper JM, et al. Pramipexole protects against apoptotic cell death by non-dopaminergic mechanisms. J Neurochem 2004; 91: 1075–81
Chau KY, Korlipara LV, Cooper JM, et al. Protection against paraquat and A53T alpha-synuclein toxicity by cabergoline is partially mediated by dopamine receptors. J Neurol Sci 2009; 278: 44–53
Ravina B, Eidelberg D, Ahlskog JE, et al. The role of radiotracer imaging in Parkinson disease. Neurology 2005; 64: 208–15
Edwards IR, Aronson JK. Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management. Lancet 2000; 356: 1255–9
Montastruc JL, Sommet A, Lacroix I, et al. Pharmacovigilance for evaluating adverse drug reactions: value, organization, and methods. Joint Bone Spine 2006; 73: 629–32
Freeman R. Current pharmacologic treatment for orthostatic hypotension. Clin Auton Res 2008; 18 Suppl. 1: 14–8
Schoffer KL, Henderson RD, O’Maley K, et al. Nonpharmacological treatment, fludrocortisone, and domperidone for orthostatic hypotension in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2007; 22: 1543–9
Biglan KM, Holloway Jr RG, McDermott MP, et al. Risk factors for somnolence, edema, and hallucinations in early Parkinson disease. Neurology 2007; 69: 187–95
Factor SA, Molho ES, Podskalny GD, et al. Parkinson’s disease: drug-induced psychiatric states. Adv Neurol 1995; 65: 115–38
The French Clozapine Parkinson Study Group. Clozapine in drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 1999; 353: 2041–2
The Parkinson Study Group. Low-dose clozapine for the treatment of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 1999; 340: 757–63
Diederich NJ, Fenelon G, Stebbins G, et al. Hallucinations in Parkinson disease. Nat Rev Neurol 2009; 5: 331–42
Fujimoto K. Management of non-motor complications in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol 2009; 256 Suppl. 3: 299–305
Antonini A, Cilia R. Behavioural adverse effects of dopaminergic treatments in Parkinson’s disease: incidence, neurobiological basis, management and prevention. Drug Saf 2009; 32: 475–88
Rossi M, Gerschcovich ER, de Achaval D, et al. Decision-making in Parkinson’s disease patients with and without pathological gambling. Eur J Neurol 2010; 17: 97–102
Voon V, Fox SH. Medication-related impulse control and repetitive behaviors in Parkinson disease. Arch Neurol 2007; 64: 1089–96
Frucht S, Rogers JD, Greene PE, et al. Falling asleep at the wheel: motor vehicle mishaps in persons taking pramipexole and ropinirole. Neurology 1999; 52: 1908–10
Homann CN, Suppan K, Wenzel K, et al. Sleep attacks with apomorphine. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2002; 114: 430–1
Ferreira JJ, Galitzky M, Montastruc JL, et al. Sleep attacks and Parkinson’s disease treatment. Lancet 2000; 355: 1333–4
Schapira AH. Sleep attacks (sleep episodes) with pergolide. Lancet 2000; 355: 1332–3
Tan EK. Piribedil-induced sleep attacks in Parkinson’s disease. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2003; 17: 117–9
Ryan M, Slevin JT, Wells A. Non-ergot dopamine agonist-induced sleep attacks. Pharmacotherapy 2000; 20: 724–6
Santens P. Sleep attacks in Parkinson’s disease induced by entacapone, a COMT-inhibitor. Fundam Clin Pharmacol 2003; 17: 121–3
Ferreira JJ, Thalamas C, Montastruc JL, et al. Levodopa monotherapy can induce “sleep attacks” in Parkinson’s disease patients. J Neurol 2001; 248: 426–7
Ferreira JJ, Desboeuf K, Galitzky M, et al. Sleep disruption, daytime somnolence and ‘sleep attacks’ in Parkinson’s disease: a clinical survey in PD patients and age-matched healthy volunteers. Eur J Neurol 2006; 13: 209–14
Hobson DE, Lang AE, Martin WR, et al. Excessive daytime sleepiness and sudden-onset sleep in Parkinson disease: a survey by the Canadian Movement Disorders Group. JAMA 2002; 287: 455–63
Paus S, Brecht HM, Koster J, et al. Sleep attacks, daytime sleepiness, and dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 659–67
Etminan M, Samii A, Takkouche B, et al. Increased risk of somnolence with the new dopamine agonists in patients with Parkinson’s disease: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Drug Saf 2001; 24: 863–8
Tandberg E, Larsen JP, Karlsen K. Excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep benefit in Parkinson’s disease: a community-based study. Mov Disord 1999; 14: 922–7
Razmy A, Lang AE, Shapiro CM. Predictors of impaired daytime sleep and wakefulness in patients with Parkinson disease treated with older (ergot) vs newer (nonergot) dopamine agonists. Arch Neurol 2004; 61: 97–102
Montastruc JL, Brefel-Courbon C, Senard JM, et al. Sleep attacks and antiparkinsonian drugs: a pilot prospective pharmacoepidemiologic study. Clin Neuropharmacol 2001; 24: 181–3
Manni R, Terzaghi M, Sartori I, et al. Dopamine agonists and sleepiness in PD: review of the literature and personal findings. Sleep Med 2004; 5: 189–93
Schlesinger I, Ravin PD. Dopamine agonists induce episodes of irresistible daytime sleepiness. Eur Neurol 2003; 49: 30–3
Korner Y, Meindorfner C, Moller JC, et al. Predictors of sudden onset of sleep in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 1298–305
Brodsky MA, Godbold J, Roth T, et al. Sleepiness in Parkinson’s disease: a controlled study. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 668–72
Ferreira JJ, Galitzky M, Thalamas C, et al. Effect of ropinirole on sleep onset: a randomized, placebo-controlled study in healthy volunteers. Neurology 2002; 58: 460–2
Micallef J, Rey M, Eusebio A, et al. Antiparkinsonian drug-induced sleepiness: a double-blind placebo-controlled study of L-dopa, bromocriptine and pramipexole in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009; 67: 333–40
Homann CN, Wenzel K, Suppan K, et al. Sleep attacks in patients taking dopamine agonists: review. BMJ 2002; 324: 1483–7
Hauser RA, Wahba MN, Zesiewicz TA, et al. Modafinil treatment of pramipexole-associated somnolence. Mov Disord 2000; 15: 1269–71
Ondo WG, Fayle R, Atassi F, et al. Modafinil for daytime somnolence in Parkinson’s disease: double blind, placebo controlled parallel trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005; 76: 1636–9
Adler CH, Caviness JN, Hentz JG, et al. Randomized trial of modafinil for treating subjective daytime sleepiness in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 2003; 18: 287–93
Ben-Noun L. Drug-induced respiratory disorders: incidence, prevention and management. Drug Saf 2000; 23: 143–64
Bhatt MH, Keenan SP, Fleetham JA, et al. Pleuropulmonary disease associated with dopamine agonist therapy. Ann Neurol 1991; 30: 613–6
Ling LH, Ahlskog JE, Munger TM, et al. Constrictive pericarditis and pleuropulmonary disease linked to ergot dopamine agonist therapy (cabergoline) for Parkinson’s disease. Mayo Clin Proc 1999; 74: 371–5
Mondal BK, Suri S. Pergolide-induced retroperitoneal fibrosis [letter]. Int J Clin Pract 2000; 54: 403
Shaunak S, Wilkins A, Pilling JB, et al. Pericardial, retroperitoneal, and pleural fibrosis induced by pergolide. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1999; 66: 79–81
Agarwal P, Fahn S, Frucht SJ. Diagnosis and management of pergolide-induced fibrosis. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 699–704
Horvath J, Fross RD, Kleiner-Fisman G, et al. Severe multivalvular heart disease: a new complication of the ergot derivative dopamine agonists. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 656–62
Vergeret J, Barat M, Taytard A, et al. Pleuropulmonary fibrosis and bromocriptine. Sem Hop 1984; 60: 741–4
Steiger M, Jost W, Grandas F, et al. Risk of valvular heart disease associated with the use of dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review. J Neural Transm 2009; 116: 179–91
Rascol O, Pathak A, Bagheri H, et al. Dopaminagonists and fibrotic valvular heart disease: further considerations. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 1524–5
Rascol O, Pathak A, Bagheri H, et al. New concerns about old drugs: valvular heart disease on ergot derivative dopamine agonists as an exemplary situation of pharmacovigilance. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 611–3
Bowron A. Practical considerations in the use of apomorphine injectable. Neurology 2004; 62: S32–6
Poewe W, Kleedorfer B, Wagner M, et al. Continuous subcutaneous apomorphine infusions for fluctuating Parkinson’s disease: long-term follow-up in 18 patients. Adv Neurol 1993; 60: 656–9
Warshaw EM, Paller AS, Fowler JF, et al. Practical management of cutaneous reactions to the methylphenidate transdermal system: recommendations from a dermatology expert panel consensus meeting. Clin Ther 2008; 30: 326–37
Fabre N, Montastruc JL, Rascol O. Alopecia: an adverse effect of bromocriptine. Clin Neuropharmacol 1993; 16: 266–8
Burchill SA, Thody AJ, Ito S. Melanocyte-stimulating hormone, tyrosinase activity and the regulation of eumelanogenesis and phaeomelanogenesis in the hair follicular melanocytes of the mouse. J Endocrinol 1986; 109: 15–21
Thody AJ, Ridley K, Carter RJ, et al. Alpha-MSH and coat color changes in the mouse. Peptides 1984; 5: 1031–6
Sharif NA, McLaughlin MA, Kelly CR, et al. Cabergoline: pharmacology, ocular hypotensive studies in multiple species, and aqueous humor dynamic modulation in the Cynomolgus monkey eyes. Exp Eye Res 2009; 88: 386–97
Pinter MM, Helscher RJ, Mundsperger N, et al. Transient increase of pancreatic enzymes evoked by apomorphine in Parkinson’s disease. J Neural Transm 1998; 105(10–12): 1237–44
Lane RJ, Routledge PA. Drug-induced neurological disorders. Drugs 1983; 26: 124–47
Muller T, Przuntek H, Kuhlmann A. Loss of color vision during long-term treatment with pramipexole. J Neurol 2003; 250: 101–2
Sweetman SC. Martindale: the complete drug reference [online]. Available from URL: http://www.medicinescomplete.com/mc/martindale/current/ [Accessed 2009 Jun 1]
Antonini A, Tolosa E, Mizuno Y, et al. A reassessment of risks and benefits of dopamine agonists in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 929–37
Moller JC, Eggert KM, Unger M, et al. Clinical risk-benefit assessment of dopamine agonists. Eur J Neurol 2008; 15 Suppl. 2: 15–23
Acknowledgements
No sources of funding were used to prepare this review. Prof. Rascol has received honoraria for consulting and/or scientific grants from GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Eisai, Lundbeck, Teva, Eutherapie and Solvay Pharmaceuticals. Dr Perez-Lloret has no conflicts of interest that are directly relevant to the content of this review.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Perez-Lloret, S., Rascol, O. Dopamine Receptor Agonists for the Treatment of Early or Advanced Parkinson’s Disease. CNS Drugs 24, 941–968 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2165/11537810-000000000-00000
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2165/11537810-000000000-00000