Article Text

Download PDFPDF

Fasciculation potentials: a diagnsotic biomarker of early ALS?
  1. Andrew Eisen1,
  2. Steve Vucic2,3
  1. 1Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  2. 2Sydney Medical School Westmead, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  3. 3Neuroscience Research Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
  1. Correspondence to Dr Andrew Eisen, Division of Neurology, The University of British Columbia, 2862 Highbury Street, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6R 3T6; eisen{at}mail.ubc.ca

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Request Permissions

If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. You will be able to get a quick price and instant permission to reuse the content in many different ways.

Fasciculation potentials (FPs) are a spontaneous discharge of a motor units, frequently, but not invariably, visible as a muscle contraction.1 There are probably different neural generators involved, from the motor cortex to the distal nerve terminal, which differs depending on the associated neuromuscular disease.2 FPs bear special relevance to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a disease in which FPs are frequently generalised and profuse, associated with muscle cramping, and may even precede the development of lower motor neuron dysfunction. Indeed, absence of clinical and electrophysiologically recorded FPs raises concern about the diagnosis of ALS. Importantly, FPs evident in ALS appear to exhibit a unique morphology, being described as complex, of longer duration, and possessing a slower firing frequency.3 In addition, the FP waveform evident in ALS is unstable exhibiting increased jitter. Taken together, such morphological characteristics of ALS-related FPs, may serve as a diagnostic biomarker for ALS, and are an integral part of the sensitive Awaji diagnostic criteria.4 ,5 Patience, however, may be required to detect FPs, since the discharge rate may be slow at any given site, perhaps as slow as once every 2 min. Surface recording with the active electrode over the end plate region of the muscle is a useful trick to record FPs if they are sparse, although such a technique provides no information regarding FP morphology.

Recently, it was reported that FP morphology was an unreliable biomarker in distinguishing ALS-related FPs from benign fasciculations that may be evident in mimic disorders, such as cramp fasciculation syndrome, or even in healthy controls.6 Given that benign fasciculations may be diffuse, even affecting facial musculature, this could result in overwhelming anxiety as to the possibility of ALS on the part of the patient.

de Carvalho and Swash, describe that FPs may be a very early feature of motor unit dysfunction in ALS, preceding other electromyographic abnormalities. Of importance, these early FPs were clearly distinguishable from benign FPs based on their relative complexity and increased waveform instability. The complexity of ALS-related FPs appeared to increase with disease progression, perhaps reflecting compensatory reinnervation. These findings would seem to corroborate clinical observations that complex-looking FPs may be evident in ALS patients even when the morphology of recruited motor units at the same needle site appears normal. In addition, ALS physicians are aware that occasionally FPs may be the presenting features of ALS. While this is seldom by more than a few months, it does highlight the fact that patients presenting with generalised FPs, even without neurological deficit, should be followed-up prior to excluding the diagnosis of ALS. Taken together, complex FPs appear to be an early feature of ALS, clearly distinguishing ALS from mimic disorders, and thereby implying that FPs may be of diagnostic utility in early ALS.

References

View Abstract

Footnotes

  • Competing interests None.

  • Provenance and peer review Commissioned; internally peer reviewed.

Linked Articles